Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection
by
De Berardinis, Ettore
, Vargas, Hebert Alberto
, Catto, James W. F.
, Cipollari, Stefano
, Narumi, Yoshifumi
, Chung, Benjamin I.
, Catalano, Carlo
, Panebianco, Valeria
, Del Giudice, Francesco Del
, Bicchetti, Marco
, Pecoraro, Martina
in
Accuracy
/ Agreements
/ Bladder cancer
/ Cancer
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Invasiveness
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Meta-analysis
/ Methods
/ Patients
/ Population
/ Regression analysis
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Standardization
/ Statistical analysis
/ Systematic review
/ Tumors
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection
by
De Berardinis, Ettore
, Vargas, Hebert Alberto
, Catto, James W. F.
, Cipollari, Stefano
, Narumi, Yoshifumi
, Chung, Benjamin I.
, Catalano, Carlo
, Panebianco, Valeria
, Del Giudice, Francesco Del
, Bicchetti, Marco
, Pecoraro, Martina
in
Accuracy
/ Agreements
/ Bladder cancer
/ Cancer
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Invasiveness
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Meta-analysis
/ Methods
/ Patients
/ Population
/ Regression analysis
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Standardization
/ Statistical analysis
/ Systematic review
/ Tumors
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection
by
De Berardinis, Ettore
, Vargas, Hebert Alberto
, Catto, James W. F.
, Cipollari, Stefano
, Narumi, Yoshifumi
, Chung, Benjamin I.
, Catalano, Carlo
, Panebianco, Valeria
, Del Giudice, Francesco Del
, Bicchetti, Marco
, Pecoraro, Martina
in
Accuracy
/ Agreements
/ Bladder cancer
/ Cancer
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Invasiveness
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Meta-analysis
/ Methods
/ Patients
/ Population
/ Regression analysis
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Standardization
/ Statistical analysis
/ Systematic review
/ Tumors
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection
Journal Article
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has been introduced to provide preoperative bladder cancer staging and has proved to be reliable in assessing the presence of muscle invasion in the pre-TURBT (trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor). We aimed to assess through a systematic review and meta-analysis the inter-reader variability of VI-RADS criteria for discriminating non-muscle vs. muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC, MIBC). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched up until 30 July 2020. The Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) checklist was utilized to assess the quality of included studies and a pooled measure of inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s Kappa [κ] and/or Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)) was calculated. Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate the contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. In total, eight studies between 2018 and 2020, which evaluated a total of 1016 patients via 21 interpreting genitourinary (GU) radiologists, met inclusion criteria and were critically examined. No study was considered to be significantly flawed with publication bias. The pooled weighted mean κ estimate was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.78–0.88). Heterogeneity was present among the studies (Q = 185.92, d.f. = 7, p < 0.001; I2 = 92.7%). Meta-regression analyses showed that the relative % of MIBC diagnosis and cumulative reader’s experience to influence the estimated outcome (Coeff: 0.019, SE: 0.007; p= 0.003 and 0.036, SE: 0.009; p = 0.001). In the present study, we confirm excellent pooled inter-reader agreement of VI-RADS to discriminate NMIBC from MIBC underlying the importance that standardization and reproducibility of VI-RADS may confer to multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) for preoperative BCa staging.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.