Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factors affecting hospital inpatient blood pressure measurement as ranked by a Delphi survey
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factors affecting hospital inpatient blood pressure measurement as ranked by a Delphi survey
Do you wish to request the book?
Factors affecting hospital inpatient blood pressure measurement as ranked by a Delphi survey
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Factors affecting hospital inpatient blood pressure measurement as ranked by a Delphi survey
2026
Overview
Current guidelines do not address the appropriate technique for accurate inpatient blood pressure (BP) measurement. Outpatient data suggest that technique matters for accurate readings. Given the substantial impact of BP treatment decisions, this study explored the relative importance of various factors for accurate inpatient BP measurement. This was a ranking-type Delphi survey conducted in two stages. Stage 1 involved document ratification (single round) where an international panel of 9 hypertension experts reviewed and validated source documents relevant to BP measurement. Stage 2 involved variable ranking across three iterative rounds: Rounds 1 and 2 required panellists to independently rank all 10 variables from most to least important with each variable receiving a unique rank; Round 3 used paired comparisons with forced choices to refine consensus. Binary decisions required > 80% agreement for consensus. Ranked order consensus required Kendall’s coefficient > 0.7. The panel agreed with high consensus on the following 10 variables in order of importance: (1) at least two measurements, (2) correct cuff size, (3) not talking during measurement, (4) correctly fitted cuff, (5) cuff at heart level, (6) seated position, (7) contemporary device calibration, (8) legs uncrossed, (9) bare arm below cuff, and (10) supported back (Kendall’s 0.97, P < 0.001). Understanding of true determinants of accurate inpatient BP measurement is still required. Meanwhile, expert consensus provides an intermediary step for prioritising factors in inpatient BP measurement to assess performance.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
