Journal Article

Review: Synergy between mechanistic modelling and data-driven models for modern animal production systems in the era of big data

Dijkstra, J., van Laar, H., Tulpan, D., Cant, J. P., Ferguson, N., Ellis, J. L., Jacobs, M.

2020

Overview

Mechanistic models (MMs) have served as causal pathway analysis and ‘decision-support’ tools within animal production systems for decades. Such models quantitatively define how a biological system works based on causal relationships and use that cumulative biological knowledge to generate predictions and recommendations (in practice) and generate/evaluate hypotheses (in research). Their limitations revolve around obtaining sufficiently accurate inputs, user training and accuracy/precision of predictions on-farm. The new wave in digitalization technologies may negate some of these challenges. New data-driven (DD) modelling methods such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) examine patterns in data to produce accurate predictions (forecasting, classification of animals, etc.). The deluge of sensor data and new self-learning modelling techniques may address some of the limitations of traditional MM approaches – access to input data (e.g. sensors) and on-farm calibration. However, most of these new methods lack transparency in the reasoning behind predictions, in contrast to MM that have historically been used to translate knowledge into wisdom. The objective of this paper is to propose means to hybridize these two seemingly divergent methodologies to advance the models we use in animal production systems and support movement towards truly knowledge-based precision agriculture. In order to identify potential niches for models in animal production of the future, a cross-species (dairy, swine and poultry) examination of the current state of the art in MM and new DD methodologies (ML, DL analytics) is undertaken. We hypothesize that there are several ways via which synergy may be achieved to advance both our predictive capabilities and system understanding, being: (1) building and utilizing data streams (e.g. intake, rumination behaviour, rumen sensors, activity sensors, environmental sensors, cameras and near IR) to apply MM in real-time and/or with new resolution and capabilities; (2) hybridization of MM and DD approaches where, for example, a ML framework is augmented by MM-generated parameters or predicted outcomes and (3) hybridization of the MM and DD approaches, where biological bounds are placed on parameters within a MM framework, and the DD system parameterizes the MM for individual animals, farms or other such clusters of data. As animal systems modellers, we should expand our toolbox to explore new DD approaches and big data to find opportunities to increase understanding of biological systems, find new patterns in data and move the field towards intelligent, knowledge-based precision agriculture systems.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press,Elsevier Limited,Elsevier
• Subject: Advances in modelling methodology / Agriculture / Animal models / Animal production / Animal sciences / Animals / Big Data / Cameras / Dairy farms / Data collection / Data transmission / Decision analysis / Deep learning / digital agriculture / Digitization / Divergence / Environmental impact / Farming systems / Farms / Hybridization / Hypotheses / Learning algorithms / Machine learning / Mathematical models / mechanistic modelling / Modelling / Niches / Parameters / poultry / Precision agriculture / Predictions / Principal components analysis / Principles / Review Article / Rumination / Sensors / Swine / Zoology