Journal Article

Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey

Farrell, D. T., Farmer, L. J.

2018

Overview

This paper reviews recent research into predicting the eating qualities of beef. A range of instrumental and grading approaches have been discussed, highlighting implications for the European beef industry. Studies incorporating a number of instrumental and spectroscopic techniques illustrate the potential for online systems to non-destructively measure muscle pH, colour, fat and moisture content of beef with R 2 (coefficient of determination) values >0.90. Direct predictions of eating quality (tenderness, flavour, juiciness) and fatty acid content using these methods are also discussed though success is greatly variable. R 2 values for instrumental measures of tenderness have been quoted as high as 0.85 though R 2 values for sensory tenderness values can be as low as 0.01. Discriminant analysis models can improve prediction of variables such as pH and shear force, correctly classifying beef samples into categorical groups with >90% accuracy. Prediction of beef flavour continues to challenge researchers and the industry alike, with R 2 values rarely quoted above 0.50, regardless of instrumental or statistical analysis used. Beef grading systems such as EUROP and United States Department of Agriculture systems provide carcase classification and some indication of yield. Other systems attempt to classify the whole carcase according to expected eating quality. These are being supplemented by schemes such as Meat Standards Australia (MSA), based on consumer satisfaction for individual cuts. In Australia, MSA has grown steadily since its inception generating a 10% premium for the beef industry in 2015-16 of $187 million. There is evidence that European consumers would respond to an eating quality guarantee provided it is simple and independently controlled. A European beef quality assurance system might encompass environmental and nutritional measures as well as eating quality and would need to be profitable, simple, effective and sufficiently flexible to allow companies to develop their own brands.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press,Elsevier Limited,Elsevier
• Subject: Agricultural production / Animals / Australia / Beef / beef industry / beef quality / bovine / business enterprises / Cattle - physiology / Classification / Color / Consumer Behavior / consumer satisfaction / Consumers / Consumption / Dietary Supplements / Discriminant Analysis / Eating / Eating quality / Europe / Evaluation / Farming systems / fatty acid composition / Fatty Acids - analysis / flavor / Flavors / Government agencies / grading / juiciness / measuring devices / Meat / Meat processing / Moisture content / Muscles / On-line systems / palatability / pH effects / prediction / Predictions / Quality assurance / Quality control / Red Meat - standards / Review Article / Rural areas / Sensory evaluation / Shear forces / Special Topic: Beef eating quality (from the 67th EAAP Annual meeting, August 2016, Belfast, UK) / spectroscopy / Statistical analysis / Statistical methods / Taste / USDA / Water content