MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Journal Article

Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ABSTRACT Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) in selected patients. NCCN guidelines recommend RFA for both unresectable and select resectable CLMs when complete ablation with adequate margins is feasible. While RFA can achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to surgery in well‐selected patients, residual tumors are associated with a poorer prognosis. Objectives To identify predictors of residual tumor after percutaneous RFA for CLMs and evaluate their impact on overall survival (OS) and new intrahepatic metastases (NIHM). Methods We prospectively included patients with CLMs who underwent percutaneous RFA from November 2019 to November 2022. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced computed tomography assessed CLMs before and after RFA. Residual tumor was defined as active tumor visible immediately post‐ablation or within 4–8 weeks, within 1 cm of the ablation zone. Data from three centers formed a developmental cohort, validated with patients from a fourth center. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed local tumor progression‐free survival (LTPFS), NIHM, and OS. Results Among 200 patients (mean age 61 years, 126 men) with 410 tumors, independent predictors of residual tumors included perivascular tumor location (odds ratio [OR] = 6.673), tumor size ≥ 20 mm (OR = 3.925), and minimal ablative margin (OR = 0.599). These factors also predicted LTPFS. NIHM was more frequent in the residual tumor group than in the complete RFA (cRFA) group (p = 0.002). Median OS was 45 months, shorter in the residual tumor group (30 vs. 48 months, p = 0.009). Patients with NIHM who received transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy had a median OS of 43 months, compared to 34 months with RFA alone (p = 0.039). Conclusions A non‐perivascular tumor location, tumor size < 20 mm, and a sufficient ablation margin are essential for achieving complete RFA. Residual tumors are associated with increased NIHM and shorter OS.