Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Use of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) to evaluate cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Use of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) to evaluate cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Use of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) to evaluate cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Use of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) to evaluate cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2017
Overview
The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) has also been proposed for use in clinical trials to assess cognitive deficits in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive function assessed by the MCCB in BD.
A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, SCI, Cochrane Library databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was conducted. Case reports, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded and a systematic review of the remaining studies of cognitive function in BD was carried out. The cognitive outcome measure was the MCCB, including 7 domains and overall cognition. A random-effects model was applied.
Eighty eight studies were initially identified. Seven clinical studies comprising a total of 487 patients and 570 healthy controls (HC) were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with BD performed worse than HC in overall cognition and processing speed with a large effect size of >0.8; with a medium effect size (0.5-0.8) in attention, working memory, verbal learning and visual learning; and with a small effect size (0.2-0.5) in reasoning and problem solving and social cognition.
Patients with BD performed worse than HC in overall cognition and all cognitive domains of the MCCB. Cognitive deficits in domains of processing speed and working memory are prominent in patients with BD. Our findings suggest that MCCB can be usefully applied in BD.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
/ Bipolar Disorder - complications
/ Bipolar Disorder - psychology
/ Cognition Disorders - complications
/ Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
/ Cognition Disorders - psychology
/ Humans
/ Language
/ Learning
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Memory
/ Patients
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Science
/ Studies
