MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol
Journal Article

Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non‐high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL‐MB 2008 protocol

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Quantitative measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) is the “gold standard” for estimating the response to therapy in childhood B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP‐ALL). Nevertheless, the speed of the MRD response differs for different cytogenetic subgroups. Here we present results of MRD measurement in children with BCP‐ALL, in terms of genetic subgroups with relation to clinically defined risk groups. Methods A total of 485 children with non‐high‐risk BCP‐ALL with available cytogenetic data and MRD studied at the end‐of‐induction (EOI) by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) were included. All patients were treated with standard‐risk (SR) of intermediate‐risk (ImR) regimens of “ALL‐MB 2008” reduced‐intensity protocol. Results and Discussion Among all study group patients, 203 were found to have low‐risk cytogenetics (ETV6::RUNX1 or high hyperdiploidy), while remaining 282 children were classified in intermediate cytogenetic risk group. For the patients with favorable and intermediate risk cytogenetics, the most significant thresholds for MFC‐MRD values were different: 0.03% and 0.04% respectively. Nevertheless, the most meaningful thresholds were different for clinically defined SR and ImR groups. For the SR group, irrespective to presence/absence of favorable genetic lesions, MFC‐MRD threshold of 0.1% was the most clinically valuable, although for ImR group the most informative thresholds were different in patients from low‐(0.03%) and intermediate (0.01%) cytogenetic risk groups. Conclusion Our data show that combining clinical risk factors with MFC‐MRD measurement is the most useful tool for risk group stratification of children with BCP‐ALL in the reduced‐intensity protocols. However, this algorithm can be supplemented with cytogenetic data for part of the ImR group.