Journal Article

TPP (totally preperitoneal) making single incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair more feasible: a comparison with single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TEP)

Huang, Qing, Wang, Xiaojun, Xiang, Xionghua, Qi, Changlei, Zhou, Encheng, Fei, Ting

2024

Overview

Background Totally preperitoneal hernioplasty (TPP) is a concept which was introduced for distinguishing with totally extraperitoneal (TEP). There is few evidence reflecting the single incision laparoscopic totally preperitoneal (SIL-TPP) characteristic. The aim of study is to demonstrate the feasibility of single incision laparoscopic totally preperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TPP) and compare the outcomes with the single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TEP) technique. Methods During August 2018 and July 2022, 200 inguinal hernia patients received SIL-TPP and 56 patients received SIL-TEP in the First hospital of Ningbo university. The demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative parameters were retrospectively analysed. Results SIL-TPP and SIL-TEP hernia repair were successfully conducted in all patients. There was no conversation happened in two group. Patients’ demographics were comparable when compared between the two groups adding the comparison initial 52 cases analysis ( P  > 0.05). The mean unilateral hernia operative time was significant shorter in the SIL-TPP group than SIL-TEP group (unilateral: 81.38 ± 25.32 vs. 95.96 ± 28.54, P: 0.001). Further study of unilateral hernia operative time revealed the mean indirect hernia operative time was significant shorter in the SIL-TPP group than SIL-TEP group (indirect: 81.38 ± 25.33 vs. 95.87 ± 28.54, P: 0.001). The unilateral hernia operation time trend of initial 52 cases of two group analysis revealed the operation time of SIL-TPP reduced faster than SIL-TEP along with treating number increasing (Figs. 2 and 3). The comparison of initial equal quantity unilateral hernia patient mean operative time revealed the SIL-TPP group was significant shorter than SIL-TEP group (85.77 ± 22.76 vs. 95.87 ± 28.54, P: 0.049). The rate of peritoneum tearing of SIL-TPP group was significant high than SIL-TEP ( P  = 0.005). Conclusion SIL-TPP hernia repair is a superior procedure and possess its own distinguished advantages. We recommend it rather than SIL-TEP for treating inguinal hernia, especially for indirect hernia. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials comparing SIL-TPP and SIL-TEP are needed to confirm these results.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Abdomen / Abdominal Injuries / Abdominal surgery / Body mass index / Clinical trials / Demographics / Demography / Feasibility / Feasibility Studies / General anesthesia / Hematoma / Hernia / Hernia, Inguinal - surgery / Hernias / Herniorrhaphy / Hospitals / Humans / Infections / Inguinal hernia / Internal Medicine / Laparoscopy / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Patients / Peritoneum / Retrospective Studies / Single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TEP) / Single incision laparoscopic totally preperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TPP) / Skin / Surgery / Surgical techniques / Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) / Totally preperitoneal hernioplasty (TPP) / Uterus