Journal Article

Short version of the Inventory of Parental Representations, a self-report for attachment assessment among adolescents

Ligier, Fabienne, Lamourette, Marilou, Epstein, Jonathan, Guillemin, Francis

2023

Overview

Background  The Inventory of Parental Representations (IPR), a self-administered questionnaire, was developed primarily to identify styles of attachment in adolescence. However, it did not present stable psychometric properties in the various American studies carried out. The aim of this study was to adapt the IPR in French and to provide a shorter version with improved psychometric properties and sound content. Methods The cross-cultural adaptation and content validity were carried out based on qualitative analysis by an Expert Committee and 10 non-clinical adolescents. For the quantitative analyses a cohort of 535 adolescent volunteers was enrolled, corresponding to 1070 responses, and divided into two groups: development and validation. The study of the metric properties of the adapted version of the IPR was realized in the development group, a sample of 275 responses. In case of mediocre results in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the development of a new and reduced IPR structure was planned using a mixed method including Classical Test Theory and Rasch Modelling in the development group. Subsequently, the study of the psychometric properties of the short, adapted version was confirmed in an independent sample of 795 responses (validation group). Results Out of 62 items translated, 13 needed adaptations. The analysis of their metric properties produced mediocre results. Content and psychometric property analyses generated two Short version of the IPR in the development group: a paternal scale for Fathers (Short IPRF) with 15 items and a maternal scale for Mothers (Short IPRM) with 16 items. The sound content and good psychometric properties were confirmed in the validation group (Short IPRF: Comparative Fit Index = 0.987, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.982, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.027; Short IPRM: Comparative Fit Index = 0.953, Trucker-Lewis Index = 0.927, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.068). Using Rasch modelling, the attachment was correctly measured overall especially for insecure attachment. Conclusions A step-by-step process involving led to the generation of two questionnaires: a paternal scale, the Short IPRF, and a maternal scale with the Short IPRM providing opportunities to use this self-questionnaire to assess attachment among adolescents. Further work will provide a solid rating for this new tool.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adaptation / Adolescence / Adolescent / Adolescents / Analysis / Attachment behavior in children / Attachment disorders / Caregivers / Child & adolescent mental health / Child development / Children & youth / Classical test theory / Consent / Ethics / Evaluation / Factor analysis / Female / Humans / Interviews / Inventory of parental representations / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mental disorders / Mothers / Observations / Parent and child / Parents & parenting / Psychiatrists / Psychiatry / Psychometrics / Psychotherapy / Quantitative psychology / Questionnaires / Rasch model / Reactive attachment disorder / Reproducibility of Results / Self Report / Surveys and Questionnaires / Teenagers / Translating / Translations / Validity