MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS
Journal Article

NODAL STRUCTURE AND STIMULUS RELATEDNESS IN EQUIVALENCE CLASSES: POST-CLASS FORMATION PREFERENCE TESTS

2011
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Three experiments used postclass formation within‐class preference test performances to evaluate the effects of nodal distance on the relatedness of stimuli in equivalence classes. In Experiment 1, two 2‐node four‐member equivalence classes were established using the simultaneous protocol in which all of the baseline relations were trained together, after which all emergent relations probes were presented together. All training and testing was done using match‐to‐sample trials that contained two comparisons. After class formation, the effects of nodal distance were evaluated using within‐class preference tests that contained samples and both comparisons from the same class. These tests yielded inconsistent performances for most participants. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1, but a third null comparison was used on all trials during class formation. Thereafter, virtually all of the within‐class probes, for all participants, evoked performances that were consistent with the predicted effects of nodal distance, that is, the selection of comparisons that were nodally closer to the samples. It appears, then, that the establishment of the equivalence classes with a third null comparison induced control by nodal structure of the classes. Experiment 3 demonstrated the generality of these findings with larger classes that contained more nodal separations, that is, three‐node five‐member classes. Emergent‐relations tests conducted immediately after the within‐class tests showed the classes to be intact. Thus, the differential relatedness of stimuli in a class or their interchangeability depended on the content of a test trial: within‐class probes occasioned responding indicative of differential strength among the stimuli in the class, while cross‐class tests occasioned responding indicative of interchangeability of stimuli in the same class.