Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Quality of sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in public health facilities in Southwest Nigeria: a mystery client study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Quality of sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in public health facilities in Southwest Nigeria: a mystery client study
Do you wish to request the book?
Quality of sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in public health facilities in Southwest Nigeria: a mystery client study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Quality of sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in public health facilities in Southwest Nigeria: a mystery client study
2022
Overview
To support the policy drive for the promotion of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of adolescents and young people (AYP), it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the existing SRH services available to them.
To assess the provision and experiences of care in SRH services for AYP in a Nigerian setting.
Twelve male and female mystery clients (MCs) conducted 144 visits at 27 selected primary and secondary health facilities in two Local Government Areas (LGA) in Ogun State, Nigeria. A 27-item adolescent quality of care (AHQOC) index with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.7 was used to obtain a quality-of-care score for each clinic visit. Linear panel-data random-effects regression models using the generalised least square estimator were used to assess quality associated factors. Sentiment analysis was done on the qualitative narrative summaries provided by MCs after each visit.
There was an absence of the use of educational materials during the 60.4% of the visits. The MCs' medical history (90.3%), social record (63.9%), sexual/reproductive history (53.5%), and contraceptive experience (66.0%) were not obtained in most of the visits. Female MC visits had a lower AHQOC index rating on average compared to males (β=-0.3, CI −1.6 - 1.0 p = 0.687), rural health facilities had a lower AHQOC index rating on average compared to urban (β=-2.7, CI −5.1 - −0.2, p = 0.031), and a higher ranking of the health worker on the scale of 1-10 corresponded to a higher AHQOC index of the MC visit (β = 1.9, CI 1.6-2.1, p < 0.001). There were more positive than negative sentiments about the clinic encounters.
This study found gaps in the competencies of the health workers, non-usage of educational materials in clinic encounters with young people, as well as the differential perception of quality of care by male and female AYP.
