Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Distribution characteristics of microbial aerosols and optimization of protective methods during ultrasonic scaling procedure
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Distribution characteristics of microbial aerosols and optimization of protective methods during ultrasonic scaling procedure
Do you wish to request the book?
Distribution characteristics of microbial aerosols and optimization of protective methods during ultrasonic scaling procedure
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Distribution characteristics of microbial aerosols and optimization of protective methods during ultrasonic scaling procedure
2025
Overview
This study aimed to explore microbial aerosol distribution characteristics in the dental clinic during ultrasonic scaling and evaluate the effects of three different interventions on aerosol distribution and protective effects. For twenty minutes, ultrasonic scaling was carried out in a standardized operatory room. A blank control group and three intervention groups were created: high-volume evacuator (HVE), plasma purification (PP), and fenestrated ventilation (VT). The mass concentration of PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10.0 aerosol particles was tracked in real time, and colony counts were calculated using air deposition. After ultrasonic scaling, there was a significant increase in aerosol dispersion of various particle sizes and distribution within a 1.5-m radius of the core area (
P
< 0.05). The number of colonies in each group varied over time at 0.5 and 1.0 m from the patient’s head, but there was no significant difference at 1.5 m (
P
> 0.05). The PP group demonstrated the greatest decrease in aerosol mass concentration difference. The VT group initially had the lowest aerosol mass concentration difference, but with a slight decrease. The aerosol mass concentration difference between the HVE groups grew with distance. Traditional ultrasonic scaling poses a risk of aerosol contamination during and after treatment. The operatory room’s air can be efficiently purified by plasma purification, which maintains lower levels of aerosol particle size than other groups. Microbial aerosols created by ultrasonic scaling can be quickly reduced by ventilation. At close range, the high-volume evacuator can lower the risk of infection while the benefit diminishes as the distance increases.
Trial registration: This study was registered on the website of China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2400090751) (12/10/2024).
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
Subject
