MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Journal Article

Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Oliceridine, a novel biased mu-opioid receptor agonist, provides analgesia comparable to morphine but with a potentially improved side effect profile. However, the comparative incidence of opioid-related adverse events (ORADEs) in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) remains understudied. This study aims to elucidate the differences in ORADE rates between oliceridine and conventional opioids in PCIA. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study at Shanghai Chest Hospital, analyzing linked healthcare data. Propensity score matching (PSM) addressed selection bias. The study included patients who received PCIA with either oliceridine or conventional opioids (sufentanil, hydromorphone and oxycodone) after thoracoscopic lung resection from January 2024 to June 2024. ORADEs assessed included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), urinary retention, and opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes within the first 24 hours post-surgery were collected. From 8208 eligible patients, 3171 received oliceridine and 5037 received conventional opioids. After PSM, 2803 matched pairs were analyzed, with similar demographics and morphine equivalent doses between groups. The incidence of ORADEs was significantly lower in the oliceridine group compared to the conventional opioids group, with rates of 24.30% versus 27.83% (P < 0.01). Specifically, the oliceridine group had a reduced likelihood of PONV (15.45% vs 19.73%; Relative Risk [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.88; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in OIRD or urinary retention rates. Oliceridine use in PCIA was associated with a lower incidence of ORADEs, primarily driven by reduced PONV, compared to conventional opioids. These findings suggest oliceridine may be a safer alternative for postoperative pain management, warranting confirmation in larger prospective randomized trials. This study is among the first to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of ORADEs between oliceridine and conventional opioids in a real-world PCIA setting, offering valuable insights into optimizing postoperative pain management strategies.