MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial
Journal Article

Comparative efficacy of lumbar and pelvic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with postpartum pelvic girdle pain: a three-armed randomized controlled trial

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common cause of back pain and disability in the postpartum period. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of orthotic support on pain, disability, and motor control in women with pregnancy-related PPGP. Methods Eighty-four women with a clinical diagnosis of pregnancy-related PPGP participated in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly allocated into three groups (with a ratio of 1:1:1): the pelvic support group, the lumbar support group, and the control group (patient-education leaflet). Pain severity, disability, effort during active straight leg raising test (ASLR), maximum isometric muscle force (hip flexion and trunk rotation), and joint position reproduction (JPR) of hip abduction were assessed as study outcomes. These variables were measured at four time points —before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, at the 4-week follow-up (at this time, the intervention period was terminated), and at the 5-week follow-up (one week after discontinuing the interventions)— to evaluate the possible effects of wearing support. Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied to determine the statistical significance between groups. Bonferroni post-hoc correction was used to identify significant differences between groups at different study time points. Results There was a significant interaction effect for group × time for the study outcomes, including pain severity, disability, effort during ASLR, and maximum isometric muscle force between groups ( p  < 0.001), except JPR of hip abduction ( p  = 0.13). There were statistically significant differences in post hoc comparisons for pain intensity and effort during ASLR in lumbar support versus control condition and for maximum isometric muscle force in orthotic interventions versus control conditions immediately after the intervention ( P  < 0.008). Post hoc tests demonstrated statistically significant differences in orthotic interventions versus control conditions after 4-week and 5-week follow-ups ( P  < 0.008). None of the interventions significantly changed the JPR of hip abduction compared to the control group ( p  > 0.008). The effect sizes for study outcomes were large, except for the JPR of hip abduction. Conclusions For women with pregnancy-related PPGP, both lumbar and pelvic supports were beneficial for decreasing pain and disability symptoms. Lumbar support showed better results for managing PPGP than pelvic support. Clinical trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20150210021034N11. Date of registration: April 31, 2021. Available at: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/70670