MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial
Journal Article

The Safety and Efficacy of Ramosetron versus Psyllium for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence (SERAFI): Study protocol for a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent condition affecting 2% to 21% of the general population, with higher rates in older adults and specific settings such as nursing homes and hospitals. Current treatments include supportive care, biofeedback, anal injections, and sacral nerve stimulation, though these can be invasive or costly. Pharmacological therapies, like stool bulking agents and constipating agents, help manage symptoms but can have side effects. Ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, shows promise for FI treatment by reducing intestinal motility and improving stool consistency. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of ramosetron (Irribow ® ) and psyllium (AGIO ® ) in treating FI in a randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial. Methods This study will include adults aged 19 years and above who are diagnosed with FI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ramosetron (5 μg for males, 2.5 μg for females) or psyllium (6 g) once daily. The primary endpoint will compare changes in Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) scores before and after medication. Secondary endpoints will include comparisons of FISI scores, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scores, patient satisfaction surveys, and Bristol Stool Scale scores between the two groups. Follow-up visits will take place at baseline and at 1, 4, and 12 months to assess symptoms and administer surveys. The primary endpoint is the within-group improvement in FISI scores, while the secondary endpoint is a between-group non-inferiority comparison of ramosetron versus psyllium. A sample size of 56 participants is needed for statistical significance at the 0.05 level with 80% power, accounting for dropout, for a total of 148 participants. Discussion It is believed that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, along with Psyllium, can improve bowel habits and alleviate symptoms, thereby enhancing the quality of life for patients with FI. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06166615, December 12, 2023.