Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Error analysis of cine phase contrast MRI velocity measurements used for strain calculation
by
Odegard, Gregory M.
, Morrow, Duane A.
, Felmlee, Joel P.
, Jensen, Elisabeth R.
, Kaufman, Kenton R.
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Calibration error
/ Cine phase contrast
/ Displacement
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Measurement techniques
/ Methods
/ Motion
/ Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
/ Muscles
/ Phantoms, Imaging
/ Phase contrast
/ Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
/ Precision
/ Strain
/ Systematic errors
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Error analysis of cine phase contrast MRI velocity measurements used for strain calculation
by
Odegard, Gregory M.
, Morrow, Duane A.
, Felmlee, Joel P.
, Jensen, Elisabeth R.
, Kaufman, Kenton R.
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Calibration error
/ Cine phase contrast
/ Displacement
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Measurement techniques
/ Methods
/ Motion
/ Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
/ Muscles
/ Phantoms, Imaging
/ Phase contrast
/ Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
/ Precision
/ Strain
/ Systematic errors
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Error analysis of cine phase contrast MRI velocity measurements used for strain calculation
by
Odegard, Gregory M.
, Morrow, Duane A.
, Felmlee, Joel P.
, Jensen, Elisabeth R.
, Kaufman, Kenton R.
in
Accuracy
/ Algorithms
/ Calibration error
/ Cine phase contrast
/ Displacement
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods
/ Mathematical analysis
/ Measurement techniques
/ Methods
/ Motion
/ Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
/ Muscles
/ Phantoms, Imaging
/ Phase contrast
/ Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
/ Precision
/ Strain
/ Systematic errors
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Error analysis of cine phase contrast MRI velocity measurements used for strain calculation
Journal Article
Error analysis of cine phase contrast MRI velocity measurements used for strain calculation
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Cine Phase Contrast (CPC) MRI offers unique insight into localized skeletal muscle behavior by providing the ability to quantify muscle strain distribution during cyclic motion. Muscle strain is obtained by temporally integrating and spatially differentiating CPC-encoded velocity. The aim of this study was to quantify CPC measurement accuracy and precision and to describe error propagation into displacement and strain. Using an MRI-compatible jig to move a B-gel phantom within a 1.5T MRI bore, CPC-encoded velocities were collected. The three orthogonal encoding gradients (through plane, frequency, and phase) were evaluated independently in post-processing. Two systematic error types were corrected: eddy current-induced bias and calibration-type error. Measurement accuracy and precision were quantified before and after removal of systematic error. Through plane- and frequency-encoded data accuracy were within 0.4mm/s after removal of systematic error – a 70% improvement over the raw data. Corrected phase-encoded data accuracy was within 1.3mm/s. Measured random error was between 1 to 1.4mm/s, which followed the theoretical prediction. Propagation of random measurement error into displacement and strain was found to depend on the number of tracked time segments, time segment duration, mesh size, and dimensional order. To verify this, theoretical predictions were compared to experimentally calculated displacement and strain error. For the parameters tested, experimental and theoretical results aligned well. Random strain error approximately halved with a two-fold mesh size increase, as predicted. Displacement and strain accuracy were within 2.6mm and 3.3%, respectively. These results can be used to predict the accuracy and precision of displacement and strain in user-specific applications.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.