Journal Article

Healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitude and practices on infection prevention and control in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic at the Faranah regional hospital and associated healthcare centers, Guinea

Diallo, Aziz Amadou, Diallo, Kamis Mamadou, Landsmann, Lena, Wood, Rebekah R., Borodova, Anna, Müller, Sophie A., Borchert, Matthias, Arvand, Mardjan, Diallo, Mamadou, Rocha, Carlos

2024

Overview

Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO launched a strategic preparedness and response plan, outlining public health measures to support countries worldwide. Healthcare workers have an increased risk of becoming infected and their behaviour regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) influences infection dynamics. IPC strategies are important across the globe, but even more in low-resource settings where capacities for testing and treatment are limited. Our study aimed to assess and implement COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and response measures in Faranah, Guinea, primarily focusing on healthcare workers’ IPC knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP). Methods The study was conducted between April 2020 and April 2021 assessing IPC pandemic preparedness and response measures such as healthcare workers’ KAP, alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) consumption and COVID-19 triaging in the Faranah Regional Hospital and two associated healthcare centres. The assessment was accompanied by IPC training and visual workplace reminders and done in pre- and post- phases to evaluate possible impact of these IPC activities. Results The overall knowledge score in the Faranah Regional Hospital was 32.0 out of 44 at baseline, and did not change in the first, but increased significantly by 3.0 points in the second follow-up. The healthcare workers felt closer proximity to SARS-CoV-2 overtime in addition to higher stress levels in all study sites. There was significant improvement across the observed triaging practices. Hand hygiene compliance showed a significant increase across study sites leading to 80% in Faranah Regional Hospital and 63% in healthcare centers. The average consumption of ABHR per consultation was 3.29 mL with a peak in February 2020 of 23 mL. Conclusion Despite increased stress levels among HCWs, the ongoing IPC partnership well prepared the FRH in terms of triaging processes with a stronger impact on IPC practice than on theoretical knowledge. Throughout the pandemic, global shortages and surges in consumption did not affect the continuous ABHR provision of the FRH. This highlights local ABHR production as a key pandemic preparedness strategy.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: Adult / Attitude of Health Personnel / Behavior / Beliefs, opinions and attitudes / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Clinical competence / Control / COVID-19 / COVID-19 - epidemiology / COVID-19 - prevention & control / Drug Resistance / Employees / Epidemics / Female / Guinea / Guinea - epidemiology / Hand hygiene (HH) / Health aspects / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Health Personnel / Healthcare workers (HCW) / Hospitals / Humans / Infection / Infection control / Infection Control - methods / Infection prevention and control (IPC) / Infectious Diseases / KAP / Male / Medical Microbiology / Medical personnel / Pandemics - prevention & control / Practice / Prevention / Public health / Safety and security measures / SARS-CoV-2 / Surveys / Surveys and Questionnaires