MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024
Journal Article

A comparative analysis of palpatory acuity in chiropractic students between 2015 and 2024

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective To explore differences in palpatory acuity between two independent student cohorts from 2015 to 2024, and to assess the potential effect of pedagogical changes in the teaching of palpation skills that emphasize sensory awareness over anatomical identification at the New Zealand College of Chiropractic (NZCC). Methods This study was a comparative cross-sectional study using two independent student cohorts. In 2015, palpatory acuity was assessed in 199 chiropractic students (42.5% female, mean: 25.8 ± 7.4 years) from 4 different cohorts. In 2024, 154 students (54.5% female, mean: 23.6 ± 5.6 years) over 4 cohorts were assessed. Palpatory acuity was measured by the participant’s ability to accurately locate a 0.1 mm nylon monofilament under a variable number of 80gsm white copying paper sheets while blindfolded. Unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess differences between timepoints (2015 and 2024) and year groups. Results The 2024 group (mean: 67.8 ± 22.5 pages) demonstrated significantly higher palpatory acuity compared with the 2015 group (mean: 31.1 ± 22.4 pages, p  < .001). All cohorts in 2024 outperformed their 2015 counterparts ( p  < .001). In both groups, acuity improved notably between cohorts in years 2 and 3 but showed minimal further gains in the final year. In the 2015 group, year 3 (mean: 38.0 ± 24.4) and year 4 (mean: 37.5 ± 20.1) students outperformed year 1 (mean: 25.1 ± 19.8, p  = .028–0.040) and year 2 students (mean: 26.3 ± 22.6, p  = .039–0.040). In the 2024 group, year 3 students (mean: 81.7 ± 15.2) performed significantly better than year 1 (mean: 59.8 ± 22.5, p  < .001) and year 2 students (mean: 70.6 ± 17.5, p  = .023). Discussion These findings suggest that emphasizing sensory experience in palpation training may enhance student performance. Educators may consider integrating more structured haptic exercises early in curricula, while future research should explore longitudinal outcomes and the neural mechanisms underlying skill acquisition to guide further educational reform. Conclusion Curricular and pedagogical changes at NZCC were linked to significantly greater palpatory acuity in students. Palpatory acuity appears to improve early-to-midway through training (regardless of the method used to teach it), with limited gains thereafter. Practical experience and repetition contribute to improving acuity, but this study highlights the value of sensory-focused practice in curriculum design for chiropractic education.