Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2021
Overview
Increasing evidence suggests a relationship between in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). Some studies have reported a lower rate of antenatal diagnosis of PAS after IVF-ET compared to PAS with spontaneous conception. This study aimed to review the diagnostic accuracy of PAS after IVF-ET and to explore the relationship between IVF-ET pregnancy and PAS. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review of the literature was conducted through August 31, 2020 to determine the effects of IVF-ET on PAS. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between IVF-ET pregnancy and PAS. Twelve original studies (2011–2020) met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 190,139 IVF-ET pregnancies and 248,534 spontaneous conceptions met the inclusion criteria. In the comparator analysis between PAS after IVF-ET and PAS with spontaneous conception (
n
= 2), the antenatal diagnosis of PAS after IVF-ET was significantly lower than that of PAS with spontaneous conception (22.2%
versus
94.7%,
P
< 0.01; < 12.9%
versus
46.9%,
P
< 0.01). The risk of PAS was significantly higher in women who conceived with IVF-ET than in those with spontaneous conception (odds ratio [OR]: 5.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.34–7.56,
P
< 0.01). In the sensitivity analysis accounting for the type of IVF-ET, frozen ET was associated with an increased risk of PAS (OR: 4.60, 95%CI: 3.42–6.18,
P
< 0.01) compared to fresh ET. Notably, frozen ET with hormone replacement cycle was significantly associated with the prevalence of PAS compared to frozen ET with normal ovulatory cycle (OR: 5.76, 95%CI 3.12–10.64,
P
< 0.01). IVF-ET is associated with PAS, and PAS after IVF-ET was associated with a lower rate of antenatal diagnosis. Therefore, clinicians can pay more attention to the presence of PAS during antenatal evaluation in women with IVF-ET, especially in frozen ET with hormone replacement cycle.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
