Journal Article

Implementing cancer prevention in occupational healthcare: initial insights from occupational healthcare staff in Central and Southern Europe – findings from the CPW project

Rodriguez-Suarez, Marta Maria, Ďurajová, Viktória, Godono, Alessandro, Bérešová, Jana, Biagioli, Valentina, Mates, Dana, Popescu, Florina Georgeta, Klöslová, Zuzana, Blažinová, Miriam Kočtúchová, Schneider-Kamp, Anna, Collatuzzo, Giulia, Wensing, Michel, Crull, Iulia, Boffetta, Paolo, Giordani, Stefano, Otelea, Marina Ruxandra, Tardon, Adonina, Kostrzewa, Magdalena, Seyyedsalehi, Monireh Sadat, Roth, Catharina, Fernandez-Tardon, Guillermo, Fabiánová, Eleonóra

2026

Overview

Background Effective primary cancer prevention in occupational health care settings requires strategies tailored to workforce needs and individual risk profiles. Cultural, perceptual, and behavioural factors influence implementation success. Occupational healthcare professionals (OHCPs), with their expertise and regulatory responsibilities, are critical for advancing workplace cancer prevention. This study evaluates the feasibility of primary cancer prevention programs within the Cancer Prevention at Work (CPW) project across Europe from OHCP perspective. Methods CPW is a Horizon Europe funded cross-sectional pilot study (2023–2026) conducted in Italy, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain. It focuses on HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) and Hp (Helicobacter pylori) screening and HPV (Human Papillomavirus) counselling among workers. OHCPs involved in program implementation completed a survey assessing their perceptions of the programs, contextual factors, and their professional role in delivery. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating more positive assessments, supportive contexts, and greater OHCP engagement. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and exploratory analyses. Results Fifty-five OHCPs completed the survey. Findings suggest that integrating primary cancer prevention into occupational health is feasible. All three programs received positive evaluations (Mean Scores: 4.18–4.23; SD: 0.35–0.38), and organizational conditions, such as resources and leadership support, were rated favorably (Mean Scores: 4.24–4.73; SD: 0.42–0.61). OHCP involvement was moderately high (Mean Scores: 3.69–3.79; SD: 0.34–0.41), indicating meaningful engagement while highlighting opportunities for improvement. Assessments varied by setting and worker group, with more positive evaluations in hospitals and among healthcare or financial workers compared to metal workers. Contextual factors differed across groups, reflecting variability in perceived feasibility and ease of implementation. Conclusion Conditions for the successful implementation of primary prevention programs targeting HCV, Hp, and HPV related cancers in occupational health services seem present. Particularly, if supported by favourable contextual factors and facilitated by employee participation. These findings offer preliminary evidence for the scalability of workplace-based cancer prevention strategies across diverse European health systems.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Cancer / Cancer Research / Care and treatment / Counseling / Demographic aspects / Diagnosis / Disease prevention / Evidence-based medicine / Feasibility studies / Health aspects / Health care / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Hepatitis C / Hepatitis C virus / Hospitals / HPV / Human papillomavirus / Immunization / Infections / Intervention / Medical personnel / Medical research / Medicine/Public Health / Occupational health services / Occupational health surveillance / Oncology / Oncology, Experimental / Papillomavirus infections / Participation / Pilot projects / Prevention / Prevention programs / Primary cancer prevention / Questionnaires / Screening / Social aspects / Surgical Oncology / Surveys / Taxonomy / Wellness programs / Workers