Journal Article

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up

Paul, Eldho, Kirzner, Nathan, Moaveni, Ash

2018

Overview

Background Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) may address issues such as inferior scapular notching, prosthetic instability and limited postoperative shoulder rotation; all of which have been reported with the standard RSA and attributed to the medialized design. We hypothesised that this lateralization may increase the rate of scapular stress fractures. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who had undergone a RSA between January 2013 and October 2016. A comparative cohort study was designed to compare patients with a standard Grammont-style RSA to those with a BIO-RSA using the same implant. Functional outcome was measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index and pain scores. Radiographs were obtained for all patients and examined for the presence of scapular fracture as well as scapular notching and graft incorporation. Results A total of forty patients (22 patients in the standard RSA cohort and 18 with BIO-RSA) were included in the study. Patient characteristics (including age, gender, length of follow-up, dominant side and osteoporosis) were similar in both groups ( p  > 0.05). The average postoperative follow-up was 20 months (range 12–48 months). There was bone graft incorporation in all BIO-RSA patients at the final radiological follow-up, with no evidence of graft resorption. The overall scapular stress fracture rate was 12.5% (9.1% in the standard RSA and 16.7% in the BIO-RSA). The rates were similar in both cohorts ( p  = 0.64). All fractures were managed conservatively. To determine whether the presence of a scapular stress fracture had an influence on outcomes, the cohort was divided into cases with and without fracture. Patients with a stress fracture had worse ASES ( p  = 0.028) and WOOS ( p  = 0.048) scores. Additionally, osteoporosis was present more commonly in the fracture group (80% vs 17%; p  = 0.01). A statistically significant difference was identified when comparing the rates of scapular notching between standard RSA and BIO-RSA cohorts (68% vs 33%; p  = 0.028). Furthermore, when notching was present, significantly worse outcome scores were present in all outcome measures ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion The BIO-RSA technique was associated with an increase in scapular stress fracture rate when compared to the standard RSA; however, this was not found to be significant. Furthermore, both techniques resulted in similar improvements in the measured functional outcomes. BIO-RSA, however, was associated with a lower scapular notching rate, justifying further evaluation of this technique. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, level III

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Analysis / Arthritis / Arthroplasty / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - trends / BIO-RSA / Bone grafts / Bone resorption / Care and treatment / Cohort Studies / Comparative analysis / Elbow / Female / Follow-Up Studies / Fractures / Functional outcomes / Humans / Joint surgery / Male / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Middle Aged / Orthopedics / Osteoarthritis / Osteoporosis / Outcome and process assessment (Health Care) / Pain / Patients / Prospective Studies / Prostheses / Radiography / Research Article / Retrospective Studies / Reverse shoulder arthroplasty / Rotator cuff / Safety and security measures / Scapular insufficiency fractures / Scapular notching / Shoulder / Shoulder - diagnostic imaging / Shoulder - surgery / Shoulder injuries / Skin & tissue grafts / Statistical analysis / Surgeons / Surgical Orthopedics / Treatment Outcome