Journal Article

Interprofessional collaboration skills and motivation one year after an interprofessional educational intervention for undergraduate medical and nursing students

Peerdeman, Saskia M., Kusurkar, Rashmi A., Teuwen, Carolyn Joyce, Daelmans, Hester E. M., Schreurs, Hermien

2024

Overview

Background The increasingly complex patient care in the twenty-first century is delivered by interprofessional health care teams. Interprofessional collaboration can be taught during interprofessional education. However, whether a long-term change in collaborative competencies can be achieved by interprofessional education has not been studied sufficiently. Our research questions were: How does motivation for interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional collaborative skills change up to one year after an interprofessional educational intervention? How are they related to each other? Methods During a one-year period, undergraduate medical and nursing students attended four interprofessional (intervention) or uniprofessional (control group) education sessions. Self-determination Theory was used as the theoretical framework. Autonomous and controlled motivation scores for interprofessional collaboration were calculated using the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire, before (T1), directly after (T2) and one year post-intervention (T3). At T3, the students also filled out the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), which measured the perceived attainment of collaborative competencies by a retrospective pre-test/post-test design. We used linear mixed effects models to analyse the motivation scores and linear regression for the relation between motivation and competence. Results In the interprofessional group, autonomous motivation scores of the participants were significantly lower at T2 vs. T1. Controlled motivation scores were significantly higher at T3 vs. T1. Controlled motivation scores for T2 were significantly higher in the uniprofessional group than in the interprofessional group. Perceived competence was related to higher autonomous motivation scores. At T3 the interprofessional collaborative competencies seemed to have grown more among students in the interprofessional group. Conclusions The perceived growth in interprofessional collaboration competence lasted at least up to one year after the intervention, and was measurable with the ICCAS. The growth was significantly more in the IPE students than in the UPE students. The few differences found in motivation scores for interprofessional collaboration were probably caused by an imbalance of nursing versus medical students over the different time points. This finding indicates that classroom based IPE can contribute to interprofessional collaboration skills of nursing and medical students at least up to one year after an intervention.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Advancing healthcare systems with interprofessional education and collaboration / Analysis / Classrooms / Clinical medicine / Collaboration / Control Groups / Education / Geriatrics / Health care / Humans / Integrated delivery networks / Interprofessional collaboration / Interprofessional education / Interprofessional Relations / Intervention / Long-term effect / Medical care / Medical Education / Medical errors / Medical students / Motivation / Nursing education / Prevention / Professions / Quality management / Questionnaires / Retrospective Studies / Risk factors / Self-determination theory / Student Motivation / Students, Medical / Students, Nursing / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Training / Undergraduate medical students / Undergraduate Students