Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
by
Harrison, Jack E.
, Lynch, Fiona
, Stark, Zornitza
, Vears, Danya F.
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Algorithms
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Australia
/ Bioethics
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Brain research
/ Data integrity
/ Female
/ Focus Groups
/ Genomic analysis
/ Genomics
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ Human error
/ Human Genetics
/ Humans
/ Machine learning
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Middle Aged
/ Next-generation sequencing
/ Perceptions
/ Professional ethics
/ Professionals
/ Proteomics
/ Public Opinion
/ Qualitative
/ Trust
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
by
Harrison, Jack E.
, Lynch, Fiona
, Stark, Zornitza
, Vears, Danya F.
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Algorithms
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Australia
/ Bioethics
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Brain research
/ Data integrity
/ Female
/ Focus Groups
/ Genomic analysis
/ Genomics
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ Human error
/ Human Genetics
/ Humans
/ Machine learning
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Middle Aged
/ Next-generation sequencing
/ Perceptions
/ Professional ethics
/ Professionals
/ Proteomics
/ Public Opinion
/ Qualitative
/ Trust
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
by
Harrison, Jack E.
, Lynch, Fiona
, Stark, Zornitza
, Vears, Danya F.
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Algorithms
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Australia
/ Bioethics
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Brain research
/ Data integrity
/ Female
/ Focus Groups
/ Genomic analysis
/ Genomics
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ Human error
/ Human Genetics
/ Humans
/ Machine learning
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Middle Aged
/ Next-generation sequencing
/ Perceptions
/ Professional ethics
/ Professionals
/ Proteomics
/ Public Opinion
/ Qualitative
/ Trust
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
Journal Article
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose
Next generation sequencing has led to the creation of large pools of genomic data with analysis rather than data generation now the limiting factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be required to optimize the benefits of these data, but little is known about how the public feels about the use of AI in genomics.
Methods
We conducted focus groups with members of the Australian public. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. We explored potential uses of AI in genomic medicine, the benefits, risks, and the possible social implications of its use.
Results
Participants (
n
= 34) largely felt comfortable with AI analysing their own genomic data and generally agreed about its benefits. Concerns were raised over data security, the potential for misdiagnosis, and bias AI may perpetuate. Many participants wanted checking mechanisms for when results were generated using AI.
Conclusions
The insights gained from these discussions help to understand public concerns around the use of AI in genomic medicine. Our findings can help to inform both policies around genomic AI and how to educate the public on its use.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.