MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design
Journal Article

Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings: An evaluation of the test-negative design

2017
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
•Rotavirus vaccines (RVs) have been recently introduced in low-income settings.•Accurate post-introduction monitoring of RV effectiveness is important.•The test-negative design (TND) is used to measure RV effectiveness.•The TND was evaluated using randomized trials of RV in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.•The TND is an appropriate method to measure RV effectiveness in low-income settings. The test-negative design (TND), an epidemiologic method currently used to measure rotavirus vaccine (RV) effectiveness, compares the vaccination status of rotavirus-positive cases and rotavirus-negative controls meeting a pre-defined case definition for acute gastroenteritis. Despite the use of this study design in low-income settings, the TND has not been evaluated to measure rotavirus vaccine effectiveness. This study builds upon prior methods to evaluate the use of the TND for influenza vaccine using a randomized controlled clinical trial database. Test-negative vaccine effectiveness (VE-TND) estimates were derived from three large randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of monovalent (RV1) and pentavalent (RV5) rotavirus vaccines in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Derived VE-TND estimates were compared to the original RCT vaccine efficacy estimates (VE-RCTs). The core assumption of the TND (i.e., rotavirus vaccine has no effect on rotavirus-negative diarrhea) was also assessed. TND vaccine effectiveness estimates were nearly equivalent to original RCT vaccine efficacy estimates. Neither RV had a substantial effect on rotavirus-negative diarrhea. This study supports the TND as an appropriate epidemiologic study design to measure rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in low-income settings.