Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How do undergraduate medical students use the annotation option of a video feedback system when recording consultations with real patients; a qualitative document analysis
by
Ellemieke, Bernardus Petrus Thoonen
, Thoonen, Bernardus Petrus Aloysius
, Brand, Guus Maria
, Rasenberg, Ellemieke Maria Cornelia
in
Annotations
/ Asynchronous Communication
/ Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
/ Citation indexes
/ Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Competence
/ Communication
/ Communication Skills
/ Competence
/ Consent
/ Data Analysis
/ Document Analysis
/ Education
/ Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
/ Educational aspects
/ Educational Facilities Improvement
/ Educational research
/ Feedback
/ Feedback (Psychology)
/ Female
/ Formative Feedback
/ Graduate Students
/ Humans
/ Internal medicine
/ Learning
/ Learning Activities
/ Male
/ Medical Education
/ Medical schools
/ Medical students
/ Medicine
/ Observation
/ Patients
/ Peer feedback
/ Peers
/ Qualitative Research
/ R&D
/ Recording consultations
/ Reflection
/ Research & development
/ Researchers
/ Skill development
/ Student Participation
/ Students, Medical - psychology
/ Supervisors
/ Teachers
/ Teaching
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Transportation
/ Undergraduate Students
/ Video feedback system
/ Video Technology
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How do undergraduate medical students use the annotation option of a video feedback system when recording consultations with real patients; a qualitative document analysis
by
Ellemieke, Bernardus Petrus Thoonen
, Thoonen, Bernardus Petrus Aloysius
, Brand, Guus Maria
, Rasenberg, Ellemieke Maria Cornelia
in
Annotations
/ Asynchronous Communication
/ Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
/ Citation indexes
/ Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Competence
/ Communication
/ Communication Skills
/ Competence
/ Consent
/ Data Analysis
/ Document Analysis
/ Education
/ Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
/ Educational aspects
/ Educational Facilities Improvement
/ Educational research
/ Feedback
/ Feedback (Psychology)
/ Female
/ Formative Feedback
/ Graduate Students
/ Humans
/ Internal medicine
/ Learning
/ Learning Activities
/ Male
/ Medical Education
/ Medical schools
/ Medical students
/ Medicine
/ Observation
/ Patients
/ Peer feedback
/ Peers
/ Qualitative Research
/ R&D
/ Recording consultations
/ Reflection
/ Research & development
/ Researchers
/ Skill development
/ Student Participation
/ Students, Medical - psychology
/ Supervisors
/ Teachers
/ Teaching
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Transportation
/ Undergraduate Students
/ Video feedback system
/ Video Technology
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
How do undergraduate medical students use the annotation option of a video feedback system when recording consultations with real patients; a qualitative document analysis
by
Ellemieke, Bernardus Petrus Thoonen
, Thoonen, Bernardus Petrus Aloysius
, Brand, Guus Maria
, Rasenberg, Ellemieke Maria Cornelia
in
Annotations
/ Asynchronous Communication
/ Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
/ Citation indexes
/ Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Competence
/ Communication
/ Communication Skills
/ Competence
/ Consent
/ Data Analysis
/ Document Analysis
/ Education
/ Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
/ Educational aspects
/ Educational Facilities Improvement
/ Educational research
/ Feedback
/ Feedback (Psychology)
/ Female
/ Formative Feedback
/ Graduate Students
/ Humans
/ Internal medicine
/ Learning
/ Learning Activities
/ Male
/ Medical Education
/ Medical schools
/ Medical students
/ Medicine
/ Observation
/ Patients
/ Peer feedback
/ Peers
/ Qualitative Research
/ R&D
/ Recording consultations
/ Reflection
/ Research & development
/ Researchers
/ Skill development
/ Student Participation
/ Students, Medical - psychology
/ Supervisors
/ Teachers
/ Teaching
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
/ Transportation
/ Undergraduate Students
/ Video feedback system
/ Video Technology
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
How do undergraduate medical students use the annotation option of a video feedback system when recording consultations with real patients; a qualitative document analysis
Journal Article
How do undergraduate medical students use the annotation option of a video feedback system when recording consultations with real patients; a qualitative document analysis
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Observation during clerkships is challenging for clinical supervisors. Using a video feedback system (VFS) to record consultations with a patient, facilitates asynchronous feedback. Within this system it is also possible to add annotations, linked to a timeline. Learners are facilitated to share both recordings and annotations with others, who can provide feedback at a self-selected moment.
Methods
A qualitative document analysis on the content of annotations from 23 medical students has been conducted to explore how they use the annotation option in a VFS during their first clerkship. Thematic analysis was chosen as an inductive strategy.
Results
Thirteen students opted to share their videos for feedback, while ten chose not to. The main themes were “content”, “labeling video fragments” and “responses to shared annotations”. Subthemes within the theme “Content” were ‘Typing’, ‘Empathy’, ‘Directing’ and ‘Communication and communications skills’. Students were critical of themselves, but tempered their feedback by mitigating language. Many students made concise notes to their recordings, without adding questions or interpretations. The provided feedback was carefully phrased and alternatives were formulated.
Conclusion
Students apply “feedback principles” as they have learned from prior training. Alternatives were carefully constructed. It seems they also assess themselves using short notes similar to items of assessments scales. Their tendency to temper their feedback and not always share the videos with others, may indicate the need for a safe learning environment, as a prerequisite for using a VFS. Considering the diligence in feedback provision and varied topics addressed, the use of a VFS seems to be a good way to provide asynchronous feedback on communication skills during clerkships, offering instructors increased observation opportunities and the chance to facilitate peer feedback.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
/ Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
/ Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Consent
/ Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
/ Educational Facilities Improvement
/ Feedback
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Learning
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Patients
/ Peers
/ R&D
/ Students, Medical - psychology
/ Teachers
/ Teaching
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.