Journal Article

Measurement properties of the Iranian version of the breast cancer perception scale (BCPS) according to the COSMIN checklist

Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari, Hosseinzadeh, Mina, Kanani, Elham seyed, Mashayekh-Amiri, Sepideh, Mirghafourvand, Mojgan

2024

Overview

Background Breast cancer is a prevalent cancer characterized by its aggressive nature and potential to cause mortality among women. The rising mortality rates and women’s inadequate perception of the disease’s severity in developing countries highlight the importance of screening using conventional methods and reliable scales. Since the validity and reliability of the breast cancer perception scale (BCPS) have not been established in the Iranian context. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the measurement properties of the BCPS in women residing in Tabriz, Iran. Methods The present study comprised a cross-sectional design, encompassing a sample of 372 Iranian women. The participants were selected through a multi-stage cluster random sampling technique conducted over a period spanning from November 2022 to February 2023. The measurement properties of the Iranian version of BCPS were assessed following the guidelines outlined in the COSMIN checklist. This involved conducting various steps, including the translation process, reliability testing (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error), and methodological tests for validity (content validity, face validity, construct validity, and hypothesis testing). The study also investigated the factors of responsiveness and interpretability. The presence of floor and ceiling effects was assessed. Results The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, yielding a satisfactory value of 0.68. Additionally, McDonald’s omega (95% CI) was computed, resulting in a value of 0.70 (0.66 to 0.74). Furthermore, the test-retest reliability was evaluated, revealing a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99). The CVI, CVR, and impact scores of the BCPS were determined to be 0.98, 0.95, and 3.70, respectively, indicating favorable levels of content and face validity. To assess construct validity, an examination of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a set of 24 items. This analysis revealed the presence of six distinct factors, which collectively accounted for 52% of the cumulative variance. The fit indices of the validity model (CFI = 0.91, NFI = 0.96, RFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.90, χ 2 /df = 2.03, RMSEA = 0.055 and SRMR = 0.055) were confirmed during the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The overall score of BCPS exhibited a ceiling effect of 0.3%. The floor effect observed in the overall score (BCPS) was found to be 0.5%. Concerning the validation of the hypothesis, Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.55 was obtained between the BCPS and the QLICP-BR V2.0. This correlation value signifies a statistically significant association. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the minimum important change (MIC) of 3.92 exhibited a higher value compared to the smallest detectable change (SDC) of 3.70, thus suggesting a satisfactory level of response. Conclusions The obtained findings suggest that the Iranian version of the BCPS demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties for assessing the perception of breast cancer among Iranian women. Furthermore, it exhibits favorable responsiveness to clinical variations. Consequently, it can serve as a screening instrument for healthcare professionals to comprehend breast cancer and as a reliable tool in research endeavors.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adult / Aged / Analysis / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Breast cancer / Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis / Breast Neoplasms - psychology / Cancer / Cancer Research / Check lists / Checklist / COSMIN checklist / Cross-Sectional Studies / Developing countries / Development and progression / Diagnosis / Evaluation / Factor analysis / Fatalities / Female / Health aspects / Health attitudes / Health literacy / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Health surveys / Humans / Iran / LDCs / Measurement / Medicine/Public Health / Middle Aged / Mortality / Nuclear factor I / Oncology / Oncology, Experimental / Patient-reported outcome (PRO) / Perception / Perceptions / Psychological aspects / Psychometric / Psychometrics - methods / Reliability / Reproducibility of Results / Risk factors / Statistical analysis / Statistical sampling / Surgical Oncology / Surveys / Surveys and Questionnaires - standards / Women patients / Womens health / Young Adult