Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Using genotype imputation to integrate Canola populations for genome-wide association and genomic prediction of blackleg resistance
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Using genotype imputation to integrate Canola populations for genome-wide association and genomic prediction of blackleg resistance
Do you wish to request the book?
Using genotype imputation to integrate Canola populations for genome-wide association and genomic prediction of blackleg resistance
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Using genotype imputation to integrate Canola populations for genome-wide association and genomic prediction of blackleg resistance
2025
Overview
Background
Integrating germplasm populations genotyped by different genotyping platforms via genotype imputation is a way to utilize accumulated genetic resources. In this study, we used 278 canola samples genotyped via whole-genome sequencing (WGS) at 10× coverage to evaluate the imputation accuracy of three imputation approaches. The optimal imputation methods were used to impute and integrate two Canola genotype datasets: a diverse canola collection genotyped by genotyping-by-sequencing via transcriptome (GBS-t) and a double haploid (DH) line collection genotyped with low-coverage WGS (skim-WGS). The genomic predictive ability (GP) and detection power of marker‒trait association (GWAS) of the combined population for blackleg resistance were evaluated.
Results
The empirical imputation accuracy (
r
2
) measured as the squared correlation between observed and imputed genotypes was moderate for Minimac3 when imputing from the GBS-t density to the WGS. The accuracy dramatically improved from 0.64 to 0.82 by removing SNPs with poor Minimac3-reported Rsq (Rsq < 0.2) quality statistics. The
r
2
for GLIMPSE was higher than that for Beagle when imputing from different low-coverage to full-coverage WGS. We imputed and integrated the diverse canola collection and the DH lines, and the combined population showed similar or slightly greater predictive ability (PA) for blackleg resistance traits than did each of the single populations with ~ 921 K SNPs. Higher marker-trait association (MTA) detection powers were indicated with the combined population; however, similar numbers of MTAs were discovered when each single population was combined in a meta-GWAS.
Conclusion
It is feasible to impute and integrate germplasms from different sequencing platforms for downstream analyses. However, genetic heterogeneity across populations could add complexity to the analysis. Increasing the sample size by combining datasets showed slightly greater predictive ability and greater detection power in GWASs in the present study.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
/ Analysis
/ Animal Genetics and Genomics
/ Bacterial diseases of plants
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Blackleg
/ Brassica napus - microbiology
/ Canola
/ Control
/ Datasets
/ Disease Resistance - genetics
/ GBS-t
/ Genome-wide association studies
/ Genome-Wide Association Study
/ Genomes
/ Genomics
/ Genotype
/ Methods
/ Microbial Genetics and Genomics
/ Plant Diseases - microbiology
/ Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
/ Rice
/ Single-nucleotide polymorphism
/ skim-WGS
