Journal Article

Decentering the Regime: Culture and Regional Politics in Mexico

Rubin, Jeffrey W.

1996

Overview

As a preeminent enduring regime in the world today, Mexico provides a compelling case study regarding the nature and locus of power. Since the 1970s, accounts of politics in postrevolutionary Mexico have assumed that ongoing domination has resulted from centralized, relatively homogeneous power transmitted outward through corporatist mechanisms. The process of transmission replicated the dynamics of the center through a combination of skillful management and efficient coercion. Even now, as researchers are emphasizing the breakdown of corporatism and the complexity and nuance of current Mexican politics, they continue to codify the past according to the terms of the 1970s analysis and view the present through this lens. But while social scientists in the 1970s were right to characterize the postrevolutionary Mexican regime as authoritarian and hegemonic, they were wrong about the nature of hegemony. In constructing a state-centered and center-centered understanding of politics, social scientists then and now have misunderstood the nature of power and domination in Mexico and the reasons for the endurance of the Mexican regime.

• Publisher: Latin American Studies Association,Cambridge University Press
• Subject: Authoritarianism / Bargaining / Corporatism / Culture / Decentralization / Decentralization in government / Democracy / Dominance / Economic reform / Foucault, Michel / Government / Hegemony / Latin American culture / Latin American politics / Local politics / Mexico / National politics / Political aspects / Political conditions / Political conflict / Political culture / Political elections / Political history / Political parties / Political power / Political theory / Politics / Power / Regional government / Regionalism / Regions / Research review studies / Social Scientists / State-society relations