Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data
by
Wedge, David C.
, Turner, Michael L.
, Correa, Elon
, Gromski, Piotr S.
, Vaughan, Andrew A.
, Goodacre, Royston
in
Accuracy
/ Actuators
/ Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Analytical Chemistry
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Biochemistry
/ Biomimetics - methods
/ Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
/ Chemical sensors
/ Chemical weapons
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ chemometrics
/ Classification
/ Comparative analysis
/ Conductometry - methods
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Discriminant analysis
/ drugs
/ electronic nose
/ Electronic noses
/ Food Science
/ Gases - analysis
/ Humans
/ Kernels
/ Laboratory Medicine
/ learning
/ Mathematical models
/ Model accuracy
/ model validation
/ Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
/ Nose
/ Odorants - analysis
/ Pattern recognition
/ Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
/ Polynomials
/ prediction
/ Remote sensors
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Research Paper
/ seeds
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Sensors
/ Statistical analysis
/ Statistical models
/ Support vector machines
/ vapors
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data
by
Wedge, David C.
, Turner, Michael L.
, Correa, Elon
, Gromski, Piotr S.
, Vaughan, Andrew A.
, Goodacre, Royston
in
Accuracy
/ Actuators
/ Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Analytical Chemistry
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Biochemistry
/ Biomimetics - methods
/ Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
/ Chemical sensors
/ Chemical weapons
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ chemometrics
/ Classification
/ Comparative analysis
/ Conductometry - methods
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Discriminant analysis
/ drugs
/ electronic nose
/ Electronic noses
/ Food Science
/ Gases - analysis
/ Humans
/ Kernels
/ Laboratory Medicine
/ learning
/ Mathematical models
/ Model accuracy
/ model validation
/ Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
/ Nose
/ Odorants - analysis
/ Pattern recognition
/ Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
/ Polynomials
/ prediction
/ Remote sensors
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Research Paper
/ seeds
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Sensors
/ Statistical analysis
/ Statistical models
/ Support vector machines
/ vapors
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data
by
Wedge, David C.
, Turner, Michael L.
, Correa, Elon
, Gromski, Piotr S.
, Vaughan, Andrew A.
, Goodacre, Royston
in
Accuracy
/ Actuators
/ Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Analytical Chemistry
/ Artificial Intelligence
/ Biochemistry
/ Biomimetics - methods
/ Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
/ Chemical sensors
/ Chemical weapons
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ chemometrics
/ Classification
/ Comparative analysis
/ Conductometry - methods
/ Data analysis
/ Data Interpretation, Statistical
/ Discriminant analysis
/ drugs
/ electronic nose
/ Electronic noses
/ Food Science
/ Gases - analysis
/ Humans
/ Kernels
/ Laboratory Medicine
/ learning
/ Mathematical models
/ Model accuracy
/ model validation
/ Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
/ Nose
/ Odorants - analysis
/ Pattern recognition
/ Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
/ Polynomials
/ prediction
/ Remote sensors
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Research Paper
/ seeds
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Sensors
/ Statistical analysis
/ Statistical models
/ Support vector machines
/ vapors
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data
Journal Article
A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Accurate detection of certain chemical vapours is important, as these may be diagnostic for the presence of weapons, drugs of misuse or disease. In order to achieve this, chemical sensors could be deployed remotely. However, the readout from such sensors is a multivariate pattern, and this needs to be interpreted robustly using powerful supervised learning methods. Therefore, in this study, we compared the classification accuracy of four pattern recognition algorithms which include linear discriminant analysis (LDA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), random forests (RF) and support vector machines (SVM) which employed four different kernels. For this purpose, we have used electronic nose (e-nose) sensor data (Wedge et al., Sensors Actuators B Chem 143:365–372,
2009
). In order to allow direct comparison between our four different algorithms, we employed two model validation procedures based on either 10-fold cross-validation or bootstrapping. The results show that LDA (91.56 % accuracy) and SVM with a polynomial kernel (91.66 % accuracy) were very effective at analysing these e-nose data. These two models gave superior prediction accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in comparison to the other techniques employed. With respect to the e-nose sensor data studied here, our findings recommend that SVM with a polynomial kernel should be favoured as a classification method over the other statistical models that we assessed. SVM with non-linear kernels have the advantage that they can be used for classifying non-linear as well as linear mapping from analytical data space to multi-group classifications and would thus be a suitable algorithm for the analysis of most e-nose sensor data.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.