Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial
by
Kairaluoma, Matti VJ
, Wiik, Heikki T
, Mäntymäki, Leena-Mari J
, Mäkäräinen, Elisa J
, Mattila, Anne K
, Ohtonen, Pasi P
, Pinta, Tarja M
, Kössi, Jyrki AO
, Rautio, Tero T
in
Biological mesh
/ Cancer
/ Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Comparative analysis
/ Complications
/ Disease control
/ Disease prevention
/ Effectiveness
/ Feasibility
/ Feasibility Studies
/ Health aspects
/ Hernia
/ Hernia - complications
/ Hernias
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Ileostomy
/ Ileostomy - adverse effects
/ Incisional Hernia - etiology
/ Incisional Hernia - prevention & control
/ Incisional hernia prevention
/ Infectious diseases
/ Internal Medicine
/ Loop-ileostomy closure
/ Medical imaging
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Ostomy
/ Patients
/ Polypropylene
/ Prevention
/ Quality of life
/ Recovery
/ Rectal cancer
/ Surgery
/ Surgical mesh
/ Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
/ Surgical site infections
/ Surgical Wound Infection - complications
/ Sutures
/ Synthetic mesh
/ Weight reduction
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial
by
Kairaluoma, Matti VJ
, Wiik, Heikki T
, Mäntymäki, Leena-Mari J
, Mäkäräinen, Elisa J
, Mattila, Anne K
, Ohtonen, Pasi P
, Pinta, Tarja M
, Kössi, Jyrki AO
, Rautio, Tero T
in
Biological mesh
/ Cancer
/ Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Comparative analysis
/ Complications
/ Disease control
/ Disease prevention
/ Effectiveness
/ Feasibility
/ Feasibility Studies
/ Health aspects
/ Hernia
/ Hernia - complications
/ Hernias
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Ileostomy
/ Ileostomy - adverse effects
/ Incisional Hernia - etiology
/ Incisional Hernia - prevention & control
/ Incisional hernia prevention
/ Infectious diseases
/ Internal Medicine
/ Loop-ileostomy closure
/ Medical imaging
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Ostomy
/ Patients
/ Polypropylene
/ Prevention
/ Quality of life
/ Recovery
/ Rectal cancer
/ Surgery
/ Surgical mesh
/ Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
/ Surgical site infections
/ Surgical Wound Infection - complications
/ Sutures
/ Synthetic mesh
/ Weight reduction
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial
by
Kairaluoma, Matti VJ
, Wiik, Heikki T
, Mäntymäki, Leena-Mari J
, Mäkäräinen, Elisa J
, Mattila, Anne K
, Ohtonen, Pasi P
, Pinta, Tarja M
, Kössi, Jyrki AO
, Rautio, Tero T
in
Biological mesh
/ Cancer
/ Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Comparative analysis
/ Complications
/ Disease control
/ Disease prevention
/ Effectiveness
/ Feasibility
/ Feasibility Studies
/ Health aspects
/ Hernia
/ Hernia - complications
/ Hernias
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Ileostomy
/ Ileostomy - adverse effects
/ Incisional Hernia - etiology
/ Incisional Hernia - prevention & control
/ Incisional hernia prevention
/ Infectious diseases
/ Internal Medicine
/ Loop-ileostomy closure
/ Medical imaging
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Ostomy
/ Patients
/ Polypropylene
/ Prevention
/ Quality of life
/ Recovery
/ Rectal cancer
/ Surgery
/ Surgical mesh
/ Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
/ Surgical site infections
/ Surgical Wound Infection - complications
/ Sutures
/ Synthetic mesh
/ Weight reduction
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial
Journal Article
Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Incisional hernia is a frequent complication after loop-ileostomy closure, rationalizing hernia prevention. Biological meshes have been widely used in contaminated surgical sites instead of synthetic meshes in fear of mesh related complications. However, previous studies on meshes does not support this practice. The aim of Preloop trial was to study the safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh compared to a biological mesh in incisional hernia prevention after loop-ileostomy closure.
Methods
The Preloop randomized, feasibility trial was conducted from April 2018 until November 2021 in four hospitals in Finland. The trial enrolled 102 patients with temporary loop-ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The study patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a light-weight synthetic polypropylene mesh (Parietene Macro™, Medtronic) (SM) or a biological mesh (Permacol™, Medtronic) (BM) to the retrorectus space at ileostomy closure. The primary end points were rate of surgical site infections (SSI) at 30-day follow-up and incisional hernia rate during 10 months’ follow-up period.
Results
Of 102 patients randomized, 97 received the intended allocation. At 30-day follow-up, 94 (97%) patients were evaluated. In the SM group, 1/46 (2%) had SSI. Uneventful recovery was reported in 38/46 (86%) in SM group. In the BM group, 2/48 (4%) had SSI (p > 0.90) and in 43/48 (90%) uneventful recovery was reported. The mesh was removed from one patient in both groups (p > 0.90).
Conclusions
Both a synthetic mesh and biological mesh were safe in terms of SSI after loop-ileostomy closure. Hernia prevention efficacy will be published after the study patients have completed the 10 months’ follow-up.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.