Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
by
Ives, Jonathan
, Huxtable, Richard
in
Analysis
/ Applied ethics
/ Bioethics
/ Debate
/ Education
/ Empirical bioethics
/ Ethical Analysis
/ Ethical Theory
/ Ethics
/ Humans
/ Incorporation
/ Integrated ethics
/ Landscape architecture
/ Metaphor
/ Methodology
/ Methodology in Bioethics
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Qualitative Research
/ Reflective equilibrium
/ Research - organization & administration
/ Research - standards
/ Researchers
/ Terminology
/ Terminology as Topic
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
by
Ives, Jonathan
, Huxtable, Richard
in
Analysis
/ Applied ethics
/ Bioethics
/ Debate
/ Education
/ Empirical bioethics
/ Ethical Analysis
/ Ethical Theory
/ Ethics
/ Humans
/ Incorporation
/ Integrated ethics
/ Landscape architecture
/ Metaphor
/ Methodology
/ Methodology in Bioethics
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Qualitative Research
/ Reflective equilibrium
/ Research - organization & administration
/ Research - standards
/ Researchers
/ Terminology
/ Terminology as Topic
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
by
Ives, Jonathan
, Huxtable, Richard
in
Analysis
/ Applied ethics
/ Bioethics
/ Debate
/ Education
/ Empirical bioethics
/ Ethical Analysis
/ Ethical Theory
/ Ethics
/ Humans
/ Incorporation
/ Integrated ethics
/ Landscape architecture
/ Metaphor
/ Methodology
/ Methodology in Bioethics
/ Methods
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Qualitative Research
/ Reflective equilibrium
/ Research - organization & administration
/ Research - standards
/ Researchers
/ Terminology
/ Terminology as Topic
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
Journal Article
Mapping, framing, shaping: a framework for empirical bioethics research projects
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
There is growing interest in the use and incorporation of empirical data in bioethics research. Much of the recent focus has been on specific “empirical bioethics” methodologies, which attempt to integrate the empirical and the normative. Researchers in the field are, however, beginning to explore broader questions, including around acceptable standards of practice for undertaking such research.
The framework:
In this article, we further widen the focus to consider the overall shape of an empirical bioethics research project. We outline a framework that identifies three key phases of such research, which are conveyed via a landscaping metaphor of Mapping-Framing-Shaping. First, the researcher maps the field of study, typically by undertaking literature reviews. Second, the researcher frames particular areas of the field of study, exploring these in depth, usually via qualitative research. Finally, the researcher seeks to (re-)shape the terrain by issuing recommendations that draw on the findings from the preceding phases. To qualify as empirical bioethics research, the researcher will utilise a methodology that seeks to bridge these different elements in order to arrive at normative recommendations. We illustrate the framework by citing examples of diverse projects which broadly adopt the three-phase framework. Amongst the strengths of the framework are its flexibility, since (as the examples indicate) it does not prescribe any specific methods or particular bridging methodology. However, the framework might also have its limitations, not least because it appears particularly to capture projects that involve qualitative – as opposed to quantitative – research.
Conclusions
Despite its possible limitations, we offer the Mapping-Framing-Shaping framework in the hope that this will prove useful to those who are seeking to plan and undertake empirical bioethics research projects.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.