Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences
by
van der Worp, Maarten P.
, van Cingel, Robert
, de Wijer, Anton
, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
, ten Haaf, Dominique S. M.
, Staal, J. Bart
in
Adult
/ Adults
/ Athletic Injuries - epidemiology
/ Bias
/ Collection Review
/ Correlation analysis
/ Data collection
/ Data processing
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Gender aspects
/ Gender differences
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Injuries
/ Injury analysis
/ Injury prevention
/ Inserts
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Male
/ Men
/ Middle Aged
/ Orthoses
/ Physical therapy
/ Restarting
/ Risk analysis
/ Risk assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Runners (Sports)
/ Running
/ Running - injuries
/ Science
/ Sex
/ Sex differences
/ Sex Factors
/ Sex ratio
/ Sports injuries
/ Sports related injuries
/ Systematic review
/ Target recognition
/ Women
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences
by
van der Worp, Maarten P.
, van Cingel, Robert
, de Wijer, Anton
, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
, ten Haaf, Dominique S. M.
, Staal, J. Bart
in
Adult
/ Adults
/ Athletic Injuries - epidemiology
/ Bias
/ Collection Review
/ Correlation analysis
/ Data collection
/ Data processing
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Gender aspects
/ Gender differences
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Injuries
/ Injury analysis
/ Injury prevention
/ Inserts
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Male
/ Men
/ Middle Aged
/ Orthoses
/ Physical therapy
/ Restarting
/ Risk analysis
/ Risk assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Runners (Sports)
/ Running
/ Running - injuries
/ Science
/ Sex
/ Sex differences
/ Sex Factors
/ Sex ratio
/ Sports injuries
/ Sports related injuries
/ Systematic review
/ Target recognition
/ Women
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences
by
van der Worp, Maarten P.
, van Cingel, Robert
, de Wijer, Anton
, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
, ten Haaf, Dominique S. M.
, Staal, J. Bart
in
Adult
/ Adults
/ Athletic Injuries - epidemiology
/ Bias
/ Collection Review
/ Correlation analysis
/ Data collection
/ Data processing
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Gender aspects
/ Gender differences
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Injuries
/ Injury analysis
/ Injury prevention
/ Inserts
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Male
/ Men
/ Middle Aged
/ Orthoses
/ Physical therapy
/ Restarting
/ Risk analysis
/ Risk assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Runners (Sports)
/ Running
/ Running - injuries
/ Science
/ Sex
/ Sex differences
/ Sex Factors
/ Sex ratio
/ Sports injuries
/ Sports related injuries
/ Systematic review
/ Target recognition
/ Women
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences
Journal Article
Injuries in Runners; A Systematic Review on Risk Factors and Sex Differences
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The popularity of running continues to increase, which means that the incidence of running-related injuries will probably also continue to increase. Little is known about risk factors for running injuries and whether they are sex-specific.
The aim of this study was to review information about risk factors and sex-specific differences for running-induced injuries in adults.
The databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Psych-INFO were searched for relevant articles.
Longitudinal cohort studies with a minimal follow-up of 1 month that investigated the association between risk factors (personal factors, running/training factors and/or health and lifestyle factors) and the occurrence of lower limb injuries in runners were included.
Two reviewers' independently selected relevant articles from those identified by the systematic search and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The strength of the evidence was determined using a best-evidence rating system. Sex differences in risk were determined by calculating the sex ratio for risk factors (the risk factor for women divided by the risk factor for men).
Of 400 articles retrieved, 15 longitudinal studies were included, of which 11 were considered high-quality studies and 4 moderate-quality studies. Overall, women were at lower risk than men for sustaining running-related injuries. Strong and moderate evidence was found that a history of previous injury and of having used orthotics/inserts was associated with an increased risk of running injuries. Age, previous sports activity, running on a concrete surface, participating in a marathon, weekly running distance (30-39 miles) and wearing running shoes for 4 to 6 months were associated with a greater risk of injury in women than in men. A history of previous injuries, having a running experience of 0-2 years, restarting running, weekly running distance (20-29 miles) and having a running distance of more than 40 miles per week were associated with a greater risk of running-related injury in men than in women.
Previous injury and use of orthotic/inserts are risk factors for running injuries. There appeared to be differences in the risk profile of men and women, but as few studies presented results for men and women separately, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further research should attempt to minimize methodological bias by paying attention to recall bias for running injuries, follow-up time, and the participation rate of the identified target group.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.