Journal Article

Head-to-Head Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of 76 Studies

Xie, Jun, Li, Guannan, Xu, Biao, Chen, Qinhua, Zhang, Xinlin

2014

Overview

The relative short-, long- and overall-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, Cypher) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, Taxus) in large head-to-head comparisons still remain to be defined. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for articles comparing outcomes of interest between SES and PES without language restriction. Short- (≤ 1 year), long- (>1 year), and overall-term (the longest follow-up of each study) outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Other outcomes of interest were target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction, all-cause death, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), restenosis and late lumen loss. Seventy-six studies including more than 15000 patients in randomized controlled trials and over 70000 patients in adjusted observational studies were included. At overall-term follow-up, SES significantly reduced TLR (relative risk [RR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.76), TVR (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.83), MACE (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.87), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.99), in-segment restenosis (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38-0.65), and in-segment late lumen loss (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.24--0.14) in randomized controlled trials compared with PES. In addition, lower rates of death (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-1.00), any stent thrombosis (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.45-0.86), definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) were found in patients receiving SES in adjusted observational studies. Largely similar results were found at short- and long-term follow-up, and in patients with diabetes, acute myocardial infarction or long lesions. SES significantly reduced the short-, long- and overall-term risk of TLR/TVR, MACE, and restenosis, and overall-term risk of myocardial infarction in randomized controlled trials, as compared with PES. Lower rates of death and stent thrombosis were also observed in observational studies in SES-treated patients.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Angioplasty / Bias / Biology and Life Sciences / Blood clot / Cardiac patients / Cardiology / Cardiovascular disease / Cause of Death / Clinical trials / Comparative analysis / Confidence intervals / Coronary Artery Disease - mortality / Coronary Artery Disease - therapy / Death / Diabetes / Diabetes mellitus / Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects / Heart / Heart attack / Heart attacks / Heart diseases / Hospitals / Humans / Implants / Intervention / Lesions / Medical research / Medical schools / Medicine and Health Sciences / Medicine, Experimental / Meta-analysis / Mortality / Myocardial infarction / Observational studies / Observational Studies as Topic / Odds Ratio / Paclitaxel / Paclitaxel - administration & dosage / Patients / Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects / Physical Sciences / Randomization / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Rapamycin / Research and Analysis Methods / Restenosis / Risk / Sirolimus - administration & dosage / Stent (Surgery) / Stents / Studies / Surgical implants / Thromboembolism / Thrombosis / Transluminal angioplasty / Treatment Outcome / Weapons of mass destruction