Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Amplification Biases and Consistent Recovery of Loci in a Double-Digest RAD-seq Protocol
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Amplification Biases and Consistent Recovery of Loci in a Double-Digest RAD-seq Protocol
Do you wish to request the book?
Amplification Biases and Consistent Recovery of Loci in a Double-Digest RAD-seq Protocol
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Amplification Biases and Consistent Recovery of Loci in a Double-Digest RAD-seq Protocol
2014
Overview
A growing variety of \"genotype-by-sequencing\" (GBS) methods use restriction enzymes and high throughput DNA sequencing to generate data for a subset of genomic loci, allowing the simultaneous discovery and genotyping of thousands of polymorphisms in a set of multiplexed samples. We evaluated a \"double-digest\" restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq) protocol by 1) comparing results for a zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) sample with in silico predictions from the zebra finch reference genome; 2) assessing data quality for a population sample of indigobirds (Vidua spp.); and 3) testing for consistent recovery of loci across multiple samples and sequencing runs. Comparison with in silico predictions revealed that 1) over 90% of predicted, single-copy loci in our targeted size range (178-328 bp) were recovered; 2) short restriction fragments (38-178 bp) were carried through the size selection step and sequenced at appreciable depth, generating unexpected but nonetheless useful data; 3) amplification bias favored shorter, GC-rich fragments, contributing to among locus variation in sequencing depth that was strongly correlated across samples; 4) our use of restriction enzymes with a GC-rich recognition sequence resulted in an up to four-fold overrepresentation of GC-rich portions of the genome; and 5) star activity (i.e., non-specific cutting) resulted in thousands of \"extra\" loci sequenced at low depth. Results for three species of indigobirds show that a common set of thousands of loci can be consistently recovered across both individual samples and sequencing runs. In a run with 46 samples, we genotyped 5,996 loci in all individuals and 9,833 loci in 42 or more individuals, resulting in <1% missing data for the larger data set. We compare our approach to similar methods and discuss the range of factors (fragment library preparation, natural genetic variation, bioinformatics) influencing the recovery of a consistent set of loci among samples.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
/ Analysis
/ Animals
/ Bias
/ Computational Biology - methods
/ Computational Biology - statistics & numerical data
/ DNA
/ Ecology
/ Enzymes
/ Genome
/ Genomes
/ Genomics
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - statistics & numerical data
/ Humans
/ Methods
/ Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods
/ Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - statistics & numerical data
/ Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
/ Recovery
/ Studies
