Journal Article

A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal

He, Yuting, Frampton, Garrett M., Miller, Vincent A., Stephens, Phil J., Ross, Jeffrey S., Yelensky, Roman, Soria, Jean-Charles, Montesion, Meagan, Sun, James X., Lipson, Doron, Sanford, Eric, Vignot, Stéphane

2018

Overview

A key constraint in genomic testing in oncology is that matched normal specimens are not commonly obtained in clinical practice. Thus, while well-characterized genomic alterations do not require normal tissue for interpretation, a significant number of alterations will be unknown in whether they are germline or somatic, in the absence of a matched normal control. We introduce SGZ (somatic-germline-zygosity), a computational method for predicting somatic vs. germline origin and homozygous vs. heterozygous or sub-clonal state of variants identified from deep massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of cancer specimens. The method does not require a patient matched normal control, enabling broad application in clinical research. SGZ predicts the somatic vs. germline status of each alteration identified by modeling the alteration's allele frequency (AF), taking into account the tumor content, tumor ploidy, and the local copy number. Accuracy of the prediction depends on the depth of sequencing and copy number model fit, which are achieved in our clinical assay by sequencing to high depth (>500x) using MPS, covering 394 cancer-related genes and over 3,500 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Calls are made using a statistic based on read depth and local variability of SNP AF. To validate the method, we first evaluated performance on samples from 30 lung and colon cancer patients, where we sequenced tumors and matched normal tissue. We examined predictions for 17 somatic hotspot mutations and 20 common germline SNPs in 20,182 clinical cancer specimens. To assess the impact of stromal admixture, we examined three cell lines, which were titrated with their matched normal to six levels (10-75%). Overall, predictions were made in 85% of cases, with 95-99% of variants predicted correctly, a significantly superior performance compared to a basic approach based on AF alone. We then applied the SGZ method to the COSMIC database of known somatic variants in cancer and found >50 that are in fact more likely to be germline.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,PLOS,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Audio frequencies / Biochemistry, Molecular Biology / Bioinformatics / Biology and Life Sciences / Cancer / Cancer diagnosis / Cancer genetics / Cancer research / Colon / Colon cancer / Colorectal cancer / Computation / Computer applications / Copy number / Deoxyribonucleic acid / DNA / DNA sequencing / Employees / Gene frequency / Gene sequencing / Genetic aspects / Genetic testing / Genomes / Genomics / Life Sciences / Lung cancer / Mathematical models / Medicine / Medicine and Health Sciences / Metastasis / Methods / Mutation / Mutation hot spots / Oncology / Patients / Ploidy / Predictive control / Research and Analysis Methods / Single-nucleotide polymorphism / Software / Statistical analysis / Statistical methods / Supervision / Tumors / Zygosity