Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Silent Side of Polyphony: On the Disappearances of “Silentium!” from the Drafts of Dostoevskii and Bakhtin
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Silent Side of Polyphony: On the Disappearances of “Silentium!” from the Drafts of Dostoevskii and Bakhtin
Do you wish to request the book?
The Silent Side of Polyphony: On the Disappearances of “Silentium!” from the Drafts of Dostoevskii and Bakhtin
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Silent Side of Polyphony: On the Disappearances of “Silentium!” from the Drafts of Dostoevskii and Bakhtin
2016
Overview
In drafts, correspondence, and diaries from the mid-1870s, Fedor Dostoevskii makes repeated allusions to Fedor Tiutchev's paradoxical articulation of the inefficacy of the word in “Silentium!” but removes them from the printed versions of his texts. The only exception is Brothers Karamazov, where Dmitrii reproduces garbled fragments of the poem under interrogation and in commenting on Ivan's silence-like speech. I use these “traces” of “Silentium!” to shed light on Dostoevskii's conscious experimentation with authorial silence in novels conventionally understood in terms of the polyphonic proliferation of speech. Beginning with Mikhail Bakhtin's own allusion to “Silentium!” in the unpublished Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity, the theorist came to emphasize the role of silence in polyphony. Drawing on Jacques Derrida's acknowledgement of the affinity between negative theology and the negative path to affirmation taken in deconstruction, I show how Bakhtin comes to conceive of the history of the novel as the gradual development of apophatic strategies for approximating the unspoken interior world of the other in writing.
Publisher
Association for Slavic East European and Eurasian Studies,Cambridge University Press
