Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?
by
Buyung-Ali, Lisette M
, Knight, Teri M
, Jones, Julia PG
, Healey, John R
, Bowler, Diana E
, Pullin, Andrew S
in
basal area
/ Biodiversity
/ Biological diversity
/ Community forestry
/ Comparators
/ Data processing
/ Deforestation
/ ecosystem services
/ experimental design
/ Forest conservation
/ Forest cover
/ Forest ecology
/ Forest management
/ Forest resources
/ Forestry policy
/ Forests
/ humans
/ International community
/ issues and policy
/ meta-analysis
/ Poverty
/ REVIEWS
/ stand basal area
/ Sustainable forest management
/ sustainable forestry
/ Trees
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?
by
Buyung-Ali, Lisette M
, Knight, Teri M
, Jones, Julia PG
, Healey, John R
, Bowler, Diana E
, Pullin, Andrew S
in
basal area
/ Biodiversity
/ Biological diversity
/ Community forestry
/ Comparators
/ Data processing
/ Deforestation
/ ecosystem services
/ experimental design
/ Forest conservation
/ Forest cover
/ Forest ecology
/ Forest management
/ Forest resources
/ Forestry policy
/ Forests
/ humans
/ International community
/ issues and policy
/ meta-analysis
/ Poverty
/ REVIEWS
/ stand basal area
/ Sustainable forest management
/ sustainable forestry
/ Trees
2012
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?
by
Buyung-Ali, Lisette M
, Knight, Teri M
, Jones, Julia PG
, Healey, John R
, Bowler, Diana E
, Pullin, Andrew S
in
basal area
/ Biodiversity
/ Biological diversity
/ Community forestry
/ Comparators
/ Data processing
/ Deforestation
/ ecosystem services
/ experimental design
/ Forest conservation
/ Forest cover
/ Forest ecology
/ Forest management
/ Forest resources
/ Forestry policy
/ Forests
/ humans
/ International community
/ issues and policy
/ meta-analysis
/ Poverty
/ REVIEWS
/ stand basal area
/ Sustainable forest management
/ sustainable forestry
/ Trees
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?
Journal Article
Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Global financial donors have invested billions of dollars in \"Sustainable Forest Management\" to conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide. A major contributing mechanism, community forest management (CFM), aims to provide global environmental benefits (reduce deforestation, maintain biodiversity), while also improving local human welfare (alleviate poverty). We have systematically reviewed available evidence of CFM effectiveness and consider the implications of our findings for future investment in CFM programs. There is evidence of CFM being associated with greater tree density and basal area but not with other indicators of global environmental benefits. We found no data on local human welfare amenable to meta-analysis. Poor study design, variable reporting of study methodology or context, and lack of common indicators make evidence synthesis difficult. Given the policy interest in and the planned donor expenditure on CFM, evaluation must be improved so that informed decisions can be made about appropriate investment in this approach.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.