Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Specific Kind of Violence: Insanity and Identity in Contemporary Brazilian and South African Literature
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Specific Kind of Violence: Insanity and Identity in Contemporary Brazilian and South African Literature
Do you wish to request the book?
A Specific Kind of Violence: Insanity and Identity in Contemporary Brazilian and South African Literature
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Specific Kind of Violence: Insanity and Identity in Contemporary Brazilian and South African Literature
2017
Overview
The recent histories of South Africa and Brazil share many commonalities. Most obviously, both have experienced a shared political history of democratic transition. Two somewhat similar forms of socio-political oppression and manipulation - military rule in Brazil (ended 1985) and South African apartheid (ended 1994) - have been replaced by democratic regimes and exceedingly optimistic hopes for the future. Yet neither transition has been as smooth as expected. Consequently, a liminal situation has been created, where past and present discourses compete for space. This has recently been explored in each country's respective literatures: K. Sello Duiker's
The Quiet Violence of Dreams
and Rodrigo de Souza Leão's
All Dogs Are Blue
are just two examples. This article will explore the common theme of madness in these novels to highlight liminality. In particular, I argue that the treatment of insanity denies the patient's individuality and replicates the identity politics of the colonial situation. This, I suggest, reveals how postcolonial modernity in Brazil and South Africa relies on a continuing and normalised psycho-politics of otherness. Further, I will consider questions revolving around language, reliability and everyday emotions, focusing on the uncomfortable juxtaposition of global, national and local in both countries as they struggle to enter the modern world order. Ultimately, the only way we can alleviate madness and harness the social benefits of modernity and globalisation comes through accepting difference and understanding the specific individual circumstances of those we call 'mad'.
