Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Identification and characterization of gaps and roads in the Amazon rainforest with LiDAR data
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Identification and characterization of gaps and roads in the Amazon rainforest with LiDAR data
Do you wish to request the book?
Identification and characterization of gaps and roads in the Amazon rainforest with LiDAR data
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Identification and characterization of gaps and roads in the Amazon rainforest with LiDAR data
2024
Overview
Gap formations in the forest canopy have natural causes, such as bad weather, and anthropic ones, such as sustainable selective extraction of trees and illegal logging, which can already be detected through orbital remote sensing. However, the Amazon region is under frequent cloud cover, which makes it challenging to detect gaps using passive sensors. This study aimed to identify and delimit gaps in the Amazon forest canopy through airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor application while testing six different return densities. LiDAR and forest inventory data were obtained over an Amazon rainforest region, defining the minimum area as a forest canopy gap. The point cloud was processed to obtain six return densities with the generation of their respective CHM (Canopy Height Model), which were applied for segmentation and subsequent identification of gap areas and roads. The minimum gap area found was 34 m2, and the Kruskal Wallis test showed no significant difference among the six densities in gap detection; however, road identification decreased as the return density decreased. We concluded that LiDAR data proved promising as point clouds with low return density can be used without impairing gap identification. However, reducing the return density for road identification is not recommended.
