Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Water availability drives population divergence and sex-specific responses in a dioecious plant
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Water availability drives population divergence and sex-specific responses in a dioecious plant
Do you wish to request the book?
Water availability drives population divergence and sex-specific responses in a dioecious plant
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Water availability drives population divergence and sex-specific responses in a dioecious plant
2019
Overview
Premise Water availability is an important abiotic factor, resulting in differences between plant species growing in xeric and mesic habitats. Species with populations occurring in both habitat types allow examination of whether water availability has acted as a selective force at the intraspecific level. Investigating responses to water availability with a dioecious species allows determination of whether males and females, which often have different physiologies and life histories, respond differently. Methods An experiment varying water availability was performed under an outdoor rain‐out shelter using plants from two mesic and two xeric populations of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Early growth rate, flowering propensity, flower size, and specific leaf area were measured. At the end of the season, the plants were harvested, aboveground and root biomass were measured, and the total number of flowers and fruit produced were counted. Results Compared to the two mesic populations, plants from the two xeric populations grew more slowly, were less likely to flower, took longer to flower, had thicker leaves, invested less in aboveground biomass and more in root biomass, produced fewer flowers and fruit, but were more likely to live. Many traits exhibited significant habitat type × treatment interactions. Compared to the xeric populations, males—but not females—from mesic populations had less root biomass and greatly reduced their flower production in response to low water availability. Conclusions Mesic and xeric populations responded in ways congruent with water availability being a selective force for among‐population divergence, especially for males.
