Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?
by
Boudreau, Cheryl
in
Citizens
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Control groups
/ Cues
/ Decision Making
/ Decisions
/ Differences
/ Incentives
/ Information Processing
/ Mathematical knowledge
/ Mathematical problems
/ Mathematics
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Randomness
/ Sophistication
/ Standardized tests
/ Statistical significance
/ Voting
2009
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?
by
Boudreau, Cheryl
in
Citizens
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Control groups
/ Cues
/ Decision Making
/ Decisions
/ Differences
/ Incentives
/ Information Processing
/ Mathematical knowledge
/ Mathematical problems
/ Mathematics
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Randomness
/ Sophistication
/ Standardized tests
/ Statistical significance
/ Voting
2009
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?
by
Boudreau, Cheryl
in
Citizens
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Control groups
/ Cues
/ Decision Making
/ Decisions
/ Differences
/ Incentives
/ Information Processing
/ Mathematical knowledge
/ Mathematical problems
/ Mathematics
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Randomness
/ Sophistication
/ Standardized tests
/ Statistical significance
/ Voting
2009
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?
Journal Article
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?
2009
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Relatively few scholars assess the conditions under which cues improve citizens’ decisions. I analyze experimentally the conditions under which one cue (the statements of an endorser) enables both sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens to improve their decisions. My results demonstrate that the effectiveness of this cue depends upon the endorser's incentives and citizens’ levels of sophistication. Specifically, I find that under idealized conditions (i.e., when the endorser always has an incentive to make truthful statements), this cue dramatically improves the decisions of (and closes the gap between) sophisticated and unsophisticated subjects. When the endorser's incentives are more realistic (i.e., the endorser may have an incentive to lie), this cue affects sophisticated versus unsophisticated subjects differently: sophisticated subjects do not improve their decisions, whereas unsophisticated subjects typically improve their decisions enough to make them comparable to sophisticated subjects. Thus, even under more realistic conditions, the gap between sophisticated and unsophisticated subjects closes.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.