Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
by
May, Felix
, Chase, Jonathan M.
, Blowes, Shane A.
, Gerstner, Katharina
, Knight, Tiffany M.
in
631/158/670
/ 631/158/853
/ 704/158/672
/ Animals
/ Biodiversity
/ Biodiversity loss
/ Conservation of Natural Resources
/ Datasets
/ Decay
/ Demography
/ Ecosystem
/ Ecosystems
/ Environmental restoration
/ Estimates
/ Fragments
/ Habitat loss
/ Habitats
/ Human Activities
/ Humanities and Social Sciences
/ Hypotheses
/ Land use
/ Land use management
/ Models, Biological
/ multidisciplinary
/ Restoration
/ Sampling
/ Sampling designs
/ Science
/ Science (multidisciplinary)
/ Species richness
/ Species Specificity
/ Taxa
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
by
May, Felix
, Chase, Jonathan M.
, Blowes, Shane A.
, Gerstner, Katharina
, Knight, Tiffany M.
in
631/158/670
/ 631/158/853
/ 704/158/672
/ Animals
/ Biodiversity
/ Biodiversity loss
/ Conservation of Natural Resources
/ Datasets
/ Decay
/ Demography
/ Ecosystem
/ Ecosystems
/ Environmental restoration
/ Estimates
/ Fragments
/ Habitat loss
/ Habitats
/ Human Activities
/ Humanities and Social Sciences
/ Hypotheses
/ Land use
/ Land use management
/ Models, Biological
/ multidisciplinary
/ Restoration
/ Sampling
/ Sampling designs
/ Science
/ Science (multidisciplinary)
/ Species richness
/ Species Specificity
/ Taxa
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
by
May, Felix
, Chase, Jonathan M.
, Blowes, Shane A.
, Gerstner, Katharina
, Knight, Tiffany M.
in
631/158/670
/ 631/158/853
/ 704/158/672
/ Animals
/ Biodiversity
/ Biodiversity loss
/ Conservation of Natural Resources
/ Datasets
/ Decay
/ Demography
/ Ecosystem
/ Ecosystems
/ Environmental restoration
/ Estimates
/ Fragments
/ Habitat loss
/ Habitats
/ Human Activities
/ Humanities and Social Sciences
/ Hypotheses
/ Land use
/ Land use management
/ Models, Biological
/ multidisciplinary
/ Restoration
/ Sampling
/ Sampling designs
/ Science
/ Science (multidisciplinary)
/ Species richness
/ Species Specificity
/ Taxa
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
Journal Article
Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Although habitat loss is the predominant factor leading to biodiversity loss in the Anthropocene
1
,
2
, exactly how this loss manifests—and at which scales—remains a central debate
3
–
6
. The ‘passive sampling’ hypothesis suggests that species are lost in proportion to their abundance and distribution in the natural habitat
7
,
8
, whereas the ‘ecosystem decay’ hypothesis suggests that ecological processes change in smaller and more-isolated habitats such that more species are lost than would have been expected simply through loss of habitat alone
9
,
10
. Generalizable tests of these hypotheses have been limited by heterogeneous sampling designs and a narrow focus on estimates of species richness that are strongly dependent on scale. Here we analyse 123 studies of assemblage-level abundances of focal taxa taken from multiple habitat fragments of varying size to evaluate the influence of passive sampling and ecosystem decay on biodiversity loss. We found overall support for the ecosystem decay hypothesis. Across all studies, ecosystems and taxa, biodiversity estimates from smaller habitat fragments—when controlled for sampling effort—contain fewer individuals, fewer species and less-even communities than expected from a sample of larger fragments. However, the diversity loss due to ecosystem decay in some studies (for example, those in which habitat loss took place more than 100 years ago) was less than expected from the overall pattern, as a result of compositional turnover by species that were not originally present in the intact habitats. We conclude that the incorporation of non-passive effects of habitat loss on biodiversity change will improve biodiversity scenarios under future land use, and planning for habitat protection and restoration.
Analysis of 123 studies of assemblage-level abundances of focal taxa from fragmented habitats finds that increasing fragmentation has a disproportionately large effect on biodiversity loss, supporting the ecosystem decay hypothesis.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.