Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster
Do you wish to request the book?
Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Humeral axial rotation measurement through a proximal ulna marker cluster
2025
Overview
Accurate measurement of internal/external rotation joint angle is critical in assessing the shoulder function, especially in the clinical practice as it plays a key role in evaluating activities of daily living and monitoring the rehabilitation progress. This study analyzed the effectiveness of using a marker cluster placed over the proximal epiphysis of the ulna to measure humeral axial rotation with respect to the thorax, comparing it with the traditional method that uses a cluster placed on the upper arm. Data were collected simultaneously using the proposed indirect approach and a conventional marker cluster to analyze three internal/external rotations performed in the Ski-Pose, frontal, and sagittal plane. Linear regressions for time series comparison reported a coefficient of determination R2 > 0.9919 in all tasks.The linear coefficients (a1) were as follows: Ski-Pose (a1 = 0.64 ± 0.10), frontal plane (a1 = 0.74 ± 0.05), and sagittal plane (a1 = 0.73 ± 0.04). Three additional planar tasks were recorded for concurrent validity and RMSE was reported for the main joint angle, obtaining a maximum of 3.87° for the pure flexion/extension task and 1.94° for the abduction/adduction task. A forearm pronation/supination task without axial rotation yielded a maximum error standard deviation of 2.64°. Proximal ulna tracking showed a statistically higher maximum range of motion than humeral tracking in pure axial rotation tasks. This indirect tracking approach is a promising alternative to the traditional cluster technique due to its reduced sensitivity to soft tissue artifacts.
