Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2025
Overview
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) in diagnosing glaucoma and predicting its progression using fundus photography and retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies published up to 30 October 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalKey. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: A total of 48 studies were included in the meta-analysis. DL algorithms demonstrated high diagnostic performance in glaucoma detection using fundus photography and OCT images. For fundus photography, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.95), respectively, with an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88–0.92). For the OCT imaging, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84–0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81–0.91), respectively, with an AUROC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90). In predicting glaucoma progression, DL models generally showed less robust performance, with pooled sensitivities and specificities ranging lower than in diagnostic tasks. Internal validation datasets showed higher accuracy than external validation datasets. Conclusions: DL algorithms achieve excellent performance in diagnosing glaucoma using fundus photography and OCT imaging. To enhance the prediction of glaucoma progression, future DL models should integrate multimodal data, including functional assessments, such as visual field measurements, and undergo extensive validation in real-world clinical settings.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
