Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Feasibility of automated AI-based contouring and stable radiomic feature assessment by HyperSight-CBCT Imaging for adaptive high-precision radiotherapy of prostate cancer
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Feasibility of automated AI-based contouring and stable radiomic feature assessment by HyperSight-CBCT Imaging for adaptive high-precision radiotherapy of prostate cancer
Do you wish to request the book?
Feasibility of automated AI-based contouring and stable radiomic feature assessment by HyperSight-CBCT Imaging for adaptive high-precision radiotherapy of prostate cancer
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Feasibility of automated AI-based contouring and stable radiomic feature assessment by HyperSight-CBCT Imaging for adaptive high-precision radiotherapy of prostate cancer
2026
Overview
This study evaluated segmentation accuracy, efficiency, and radiomic feature stability for manual (MD), artificial intelligence-based (AI), and hybrid (MD + AI) contouring of pelvic organs on planning CT (pCT) and HyperSight cone-beam CT (hCBCT) for adaptive radiotherapy. Dice similarity and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) quantified segmentation agreement, while radiomic feature stability was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Agreement between segmentation approaches was highest for bladder and femora (median Dice 0.95–0.96; HD95 1.88–2.17 mm), intermediate for prostate and rectum (median Dice 0.92; HD95 2.22–2.62 mm), and lowest for seminal vesicles and penile bulb (median Dice 0.76–0.83; HD95 3.01–3.41 mm). AI and MD + AI reduced contouring times by about 90% and 60% compared to MD. Radiomic feature stability differed significantly between segmentation modes (all p
adj
≤ 0.05). GLRLM features exhibited significantly higher stability than other features, whereas morphological features showed lower stability. Median radiomic feature stability was highest for bladder and femora, and intermediate for prostate and rectum. In conclusion, AI-based and hybrid contouring achieved high accuracy and substantial time savings, while texture- and intensity-based radiomic features showed robustness with AI segmentation. This study demonstrated feasibility of extracting distinct, reliable quantitative parameters based on AI-only contouring of pelvic structures.
