Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
by
Mobley, David L.
, Shirts, Michael R.
, Gilson, Michael K.
, Bannan, Caitlin C.
, Burley, Kalistyn H.
, Chiu, Michael
in
Accuracy
/ Animal Anatomy
/ Blinds
/ CAD
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ Computer aided design
/ Computer Applications in Chemistry
/ Computer Simulation
/ Cyclohexanes - chemistry
/ Drug Discovery
/ Errors
/ Free energy
/ Histology
/ Hydration
/ Ligands
/ Mathematical models
/ Models, Chemical
/ Molecular Structure
/ Morphology
/ Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry
/ Physical Chemistry
/ Predictions
/ Proteins
/ Small Molecule Libraries - chemistry
/ Solubility
/ Solvents - chemistry
/ Statistical analysis
/ Tautomers
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uncertainty
/ Water - chemistry
/ Water distribution
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
by
Mobley, David L.
, Shirts, Michael R.
, Gilson, Michael K.
, Bannan, Caitlin C.
, Burley, Kalistyn H.
, Chiu, Michael
in
Accuracy
/ Animal Anatomy
/ Blinds
/ CAD
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ Computer aided design
/ Computer Applications in Chemistry
/ Computer Simulation
/ Cyclohexanes - chemistry
/ Drug Discovery
/ Errors
/ Free energy
/ Histology
/ Hydration
/ Ligands
/ Mathematical models
/ Models, Chemical
/ Molecular Structure
/ Morphology
/ Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry
/ Physical Chemistry
/ Predictions
/ Proteins
/ Small Molecule Libraries - chemistry
/ Solubility
/ Solvents - chemistry
/ Statistical analysis
/ Tautomers
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uncertainty
/ Water - chemistry
/ Water distribution
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
by
Mobley, David L.
, Shirts, Michael R.
, Gilson, Michael K.
, Bannan, Caitlin C.
, Burley, Kalistyn H.
, Chiu, Michael
in
Accuracy
/ Animal Anatomy
/ Blinds
/ CAD
/ Chemistry
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ Computer aided design
/ Computer Applications in Chemistry
/ Computer Simulation
/ Cyclohexanes - chemistry
/ Drug Discovery
/ Errors
/ Free energy
/ Histology
/ Hydration
/ Ligands
/ Mathematical models
/ Models, Chemical
/ Molecular Structure
/ Morphology
/ Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry
/ Physical Chemistry
/ Predictions
/ Proteins
/ Small Molecule Libraries - chemistry
/ Solubility
/ Solvents - chemistry
/ Statistical analysis
/ Tautomers
/ Thermodynamics
/ Uncertainty
/ Water - chemistry
/ Water distribution
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
Journal Article
Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In the recent SAMPL5 challenge, participants submitted predictions for cyclohexane/water distribution coefficients for a set of 53 small molecules. Distribution coefficients (log
D
) replace the hydration free energies that were a central part of the past five SAMPL challenges. A wide variety of computational methods were represented by the 76 submissions from 18 participating groups. Here, we analyze submissions by a variety of error metrics and provide details for a number of reference calculations we performed. As in the SAMPL4 challenge, we assessed the ability of participants to evaluate not just their statistical uncertainty, but their model uncertainty—how well they can predict the magnitude of their model or force field error for specific predictions. Unfortunately, this remains an area where prediction and analysis need improvement. In SAMPL4 the top performing submissions achieved a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) around 1.5 kcal/mol. If we anticipate accuracy in log
D
predictions to be similar to the hydration free energy predictions in SAMPL4, the expected error here would be around 1.54 log units. Only a few submissions had an RMSE below 2.5 log units in their predicted log
D
values. However, distribution coefficients introduced complexities not present in past SAMPL challenges, including tautomer enumeration, that are likely to be important in predicting biomolecular properties of interest to drug discovery, therefore some decrease in accuracy would be expected. Overall, the SAMPL5 distribution coefficient challenge provided great insight into the importance of modeling a variety of physical effects. We believe these types of measurements will be a promising source of data for future blind challenges, especially in view of the relatively straightforward nature of the experiments and the level of insight provided.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.