Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Impact of a Range‐Shifting Predator Is Affected by Prey Preference and Composition
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Impact of a Range‐Shifting Predator Is Affected by Prey Preference and Composition
Do you wish to request the book?
The Impact of a Range‐Shifting Predator Is Affected by Prey Preference and Composition
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Impact of a Range‐Shifting Predator Is Affected by Prey Preference and Composition
2025
Overview
Global biodiversity is undergoing a grand reshuffling with species across taxa and biomes shifting their ranges in response to climate change. Research on the ecological impacts of range‐shifting species has prioritized linking the traits of the range‐shifting species themselves to impacts, with studies giving more limited attention to the characteristics of the recipient community and its prey composition. Understanding how community composition and structure can alter the impact of novel species via prey preferences is important for predicting and managing ecological changes. We used the range‐shifting predatory whelk Mexacanthina lugubris as a case study to investigate how prey composition might influence prey preferences and overall range shift impacts on prey species. Specifically, we hypothesized that Mexacanthina lugubris' consumptive effects on a single prey species would be modified by the presence (or abundance) of a second prey species. We tested this hypothesis via a field experiment in southern California, where we caged whelks at a gradient of densities and observed their predation on mussels, barnacles living on bare rock, and barnacles living on mussels over 8 weeks. We found that Mexacanthina lugubris consumed barnacles on bare rock preferentially before consuming barnacles on mussels and mussels themselves. Our findings demonstrate that the presence of mussels (which act as both habitat and prey) can mitigate the overall impact of the range‐shifting predator by altering accessibility of barnacle prey. This context‐dependent attenuation of predator impacts highlights a form of apparent facilitation among prey and underscores the importance of considering recipient community traits when assessing or managing the ecological consequences of range‐shifting species.
