MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?
Journal Article

Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background This study aimed to assess the most appropriate thresholds for albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) in patients who had a suspected periprosthetic knee infection. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed threshold was evaluated. Materials and methods Between January 2020 and April 2022, patients with failed or painful knee arthroplasty who were admitted to a tertiary referral institution undergoing the standardized diagnostic protocol to identify those with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria were used to classify patients with PJIs and aseptic joints. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AGR were calculated to define the test’s diagnostic accuracy. Results The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AGR was 1.43. AGR registered a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91–197%), a specificity of 63% (95% CI 56–69%), a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 69–81%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 86–94%). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.88). Although body mass index (BMI), uremia, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), international normalized ratio (INR), and alkaline phosphatase showed significant differences between the false positive cases and those cases affected by aseptic failure with AGR higher than 1.43, indicating potential confounding effects ( p  < 0.05), no parameter was found to be a significant predictor of false positives cases ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions For its high sensitivity, AGR showed potential as a screening tool for detecting infections in PJI diagnostics. Level of evidence : III.