Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies
by
Strickler, Howard D.
, Kurland, Irwin J.
, Isasi, Carmen R.
, Burk, Robert D.
, Qiu, Yunping
, Kaplan, Robert C.
, Qi, Qibin
, Wang, Zheng
, Wang, Tao
, Usyk, Mykhaylo
, Zolnik, Christine P.
in
Acetic acid
/ Bar codes
/ Bioinformatics
/ Butyric acid
/ Cellular and Infection Microbiology
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Diversity indices
/ DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
/ DNA, Bacterial - genetics
/ DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry
/ DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
/ Einstein, Albert (1879-1955)
/ Epidemiology
/ Ethanol
/ Fatty Acids - analysis
/ fecal microbiome
/ Feces
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Feces - microbiology
/ Freezing
/ Gut microbiota
/ Healthy Volunteers
/ Humans
/ integrative analysis
/ Intestinal microflora
/ Laboratories
/ Manufacturers
/ Metabolites
/ Metabolomics
/ Metabolomics - methods
/ Metagenomics - methods
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota
/ multi-omics integration
/ Phylogeny
/ Preservatives
/ Propionic acid
/ RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
/ rRNA 16S
/ sampling methods
/ Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Temperature
/ Thermal cycling
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies
by
Strickler, Howard D.
, Kurland, Irwin J.
, Isasi, Carmen R.
, Burk, Robert D.
, Qiu, Yunping
, Kaplan, Robert C.
, Qi, Qibin
, Wang, Zheng
, Wang, Tao
, Usyk, Mykhaylo
, Zolnik, Christine P.
in
Acetic acid
/ Bar codes
/ Bioinformatics
/ Butyric acid
/ Cellular and Infection Microbiology
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Diversity indices
/ DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
/ DNA, Bacterial - genetics
/ DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry
/ DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
/ Einstein, Albert (1879-1955)
/ Epidemiology
/ Ethanol
/ Fatty Acids - analysis
/ fecal microbiome
/ Feces
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Feces - microbiology
/ Freezing
/ Gut microbiota
/ Healthy Volunteers
/ Humans
/ integrative analysis
/ Intestinal microflora
/ Laboratories
/ Manufacturers
/ Metabolites
/ Metabolomics
/ Metabolomics - methods
/ Metagenomics - methods
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota
/ multi-omics integration
/ Phylogeny
/ Preservatives
/ Propionic acid
/ RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
/ rRNA 16S
/ sampling methods
/ Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Temperature
/ Thermal cycling
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies
by
Strickler, Howard D.
, Kurland, Irwin J.
, Isasi, Carmen R.
, Burk, Robert D.
, Qiu, Yunping
, Kaplan, Robert C.
, Qi, Qibin
, Wang, Zheng
, Wang, Tao
, Usyk, Mykhaylo
, Zolnik, Christine P.
in
Acetic acid
/ Bar codes
/ Bioinformatics
/ Butyric acid
/ Cellular and Infection Microbiology
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Diversity indices
/ DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
/ DNA, Bacterial - genetics
/ DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry
/ DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
/ Einstein, Albert (1879-1955)
/ Epidemiology
/ Ethanol
/ Fatty Acids - analysis
/ fecal microbiome
/ Feces
/ Feces - chemistry
/ Feces - microbiology
/ Freezing
/ Gut microbiota
/ Healthy Volunteers
/ Humans
/ integrative analysis
/ Intestinal microflora
/ Laboratories
/ Manufacturers
/ Metabolites
/ Metabolomics
/ Metabolomics - methods
/ Metagenomics - methods
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota
/ multi-omics integration
/ Phylogeny
/ Preservatives
/ Propionic acid
/ RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
/ rRNA 16S
/ sampling methods
/ Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Temperature
/ Thermal cycling
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies
Journal Article
Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Integrated microbiome and metabolomics analyses hold the potential to reveal interactions between host and microbiota in relation to disease risks. However, there are few studies evaluating how field methods influence fecal microbiome characterization and metabolomics profiling.
Five fecal collection methods [immediate freezing at -20°C without preservative, OMNIgene GUT, 95% ethanol, RNA
, and Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards] were used to collect 40 fecal samples from eight healthy volunteers. We performed gut microbiota 16S rRNA sequencing, untargeted metabolomics profiling, and targeted metabolomics focusing on short chained fatty acids (SCFAs). Metrics included α-diversity and β-diversity as well as distributions of predominant phyla. To evaluate the concordance with the \"gold standard\" immediate freezing, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for alternate fecal collection systems were calculated. Correlations between SCFAs and gut microbiota were also examined.
The FTA cards had the highest ICCs compared to the immediate freezing method for α-diversity indices (ICCs = 0.96, 0.96, 0.76 for Shannon index, Simpson's Index, Chao-1 Index, respectively), followed by OMNIgene GUT, RNA
, and 95% ethanol. High ICCs (all >0.88) were observed for all methods for the β-diversity metric. For untargeted metabolomics, in comparison to immediate freezing which detected 621 metabolites at ≥75% detectability level, 95% ethanol showed the largest overlapping set of metabolites (
= 430; 69.2%), followed by FTA cards (
= 330; 53.1%) and OMNIgene GUT (
= 213; 34.3%). Both OMNIgene GUT (ICCs = 0.82, 0.93, 0.64) and FTA cards (ICCs = 0.87, 0.85, 0.54) had acceptable ICCs for the top three predominant SCFAs (butyric acid, propionic acid and acetic acid). Nominally significant correlations between bacterial genera and SCFAs (
< 0.05) were observed in fecal samples collected by different methods. Of note, a high correlation between the genus
(known butyrate producer) and butyric acid was observed for both immediate freezing (
= 0.83) and FTA cards (
= 0.74).
Four alternative fecal collection methods are generally comparable with immediate freezing, but there are differences in certain measures of the gut microbiome and fecal metabolome across methods. Choice of method depends on the research interests, simplicity of fecal collection procedures and ease of transportation to the lab, especially for large epidemiological studies.
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA,Frontiers Media S.A
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.