Journal Article

Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition through community health volunteers is a cost‐effective intervention: Evidence from a resource‐limited setting

Njiru, James, Kavoo, Daniel, Tewoldeberhan, Daniel, Ilboudo, Patrick G., Donfouet, Hermann Pythagore Pierre, Wilunda, Calistus, Mwangi, Bonventure, Kimani‐Murage, Elizabeth, Zerfu, Taddese Alemu, Raburu, Judith, Mwaniki, Elizabeth, Okoth, Peter, Mutua, Alex, Maina, Lucy, Matanda, Charles, Keane, Emily, Agutu, Olivia, Schofield, Lilly, Cichon, Bernardette, Gichohi, Grace, Kutondo, Edward, Karimurio, Lydia

2024

Overview

Treatment outcomes for acute malnutrition can be improved by integrating treatment into community case management (iCCM). However, little is known about the cost‐effectiveness of this integrated nutrition intervention. The present study investigates the cost‐effectiveness of treating moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) through community health volunteer (CHV) and integrating it with routine iCCM. A cost‐effectiveness model compared the costs and effects of CHV sites plus health facility‐based treatment (intervention) with the routine health facility‐based treatment strategy alone (control). The costing assessments combined both provider and patient costs. The cost per DALY averted was the primary metric for the comparison, on which sensitivity analysis was performed. Additionally, the integrated strategy's relative value for money was evaluated using the most recent country‐specific gross domestic product threshold metrics. The intervention dominated the health facility‐based strategy alone on all computed cost‐effectiveness outcomes. MAM treatment by CHVs plus health facilities was estimated to yield a cost per death and DALY averted of US $ 8743 and US$397, respectively, as opposed to US $ 13,846 and US$637 in the control group. The findings also showed that the intervention group spent less per child treated and recovered than the control group: US $ 214 versus US$270 and US $ 306 versus US$485, respectively. Compared with facility‐based treatment, treating MAM by CHVs and health facilities was a cost‐effective intervention. Additional gains could be achieved if more children with MAM are enrolled and treated. Key messages Treatment of MAM by CHVs and health facilities involved a lower cost compared with the health facility‐based treatment approach alone. Treatment of MAM by CHVs and health facilities was cost‐effective compared with the health facility‐based treatment approach alone. Greater health and economic gains could be realized if more children with MAM are enrolled and treated by CHVs through the integration of acute malnutrition treatment into iCCM.

• Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
• Subject: Acute Disease / Case management / Case Management - economics / Child, Preschool / Children / Clinical outcomes / Community / Community health / Community Health Services - economics / Community Health Services - methods / Community Health Workers - economics / community management of acute malnutrition / Community volunteers / Cost analysis / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Costing / Costs / cost‐effectiveness / Disability adjusted life years / Effectiveness / Female / GDP / Gross Domestic Product / Health care expenditures / Health facilities / Health planning / Health services / Humans / Infant / integrated community case management / Intervention / Kenya / Male / Malnutrition / Malnutrition - economics / Malnutrition - prevention & control / Malnutrition - therapy / Medical treatment / moderate acute malnutrition / Money / Nutrition / Original / Resource-Limited Settings / Sensitivity analysis / Strategies / Treatment outcomes / Volunteers